Search for: All records

Changes in the quality and quantity of food consumed can affect the health of hosts, their ability to control infections and potentially shape the likelihood of pathogen spillover. Dietary shifts have been proposed as one of the factors driving spillovers of zoonotic viruses from bats to humans. In this study, we examined how diet composition alters the immune response to viral shedding and the risk of spillover by developing a mechanistic model fitted to experimental data of Jamaican fruit bats infected with influenza A virus H18N11 and fed different diets. The model selected from alternative immune and metabolic relationships showed that the coupled effects of citrulline and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF) affected the control of viral shedding with parameters that varied with diet. Bats on the suboptimal fat diet appeared to control shedding more successfully than bats on suboptimal sugar or optimal protein diets. Yet, bats on the optimal diet could potentially cause lower hazard of spillover because of reduced food consumption, suggesting fewer and/or shorter visits at the feeding sites and thus transmission to secondary hosts. This study provides a parsimonious explanation of the barriers that affect viral shedding by reservoir hosts and the consequences for the hazard of spillover. 

Land-use change may drive viral spillover from bats into humans, partly through dietary shifts caused by decreased availability of native foods and increased availability of cultivated foods. We experimentally manipulated diets of Jamaican fruit bats to investigate whether diet influences viral shedding. To reflect dietary changes experienced by wild bats during periods of nutritional stress, Jamaican fruit bats were fed either a standard diet or a putative suboptimal diet, which was deprived of protein (suboptimal-sugar diet) and/or supplemented with fat (suboptimal-fat diet). Upon H18N11 influenza A-virus infection, bats fed on the suboptimal-sugar diet shed the most viral RNA for the longest period, but bats fed the suboptimal-fat diet shed the least viral RNA for the shortest period. Bats on both suboptimal diets ate more food than the standard diet, suggesting nutritional changes may alter foraging behaviour. This study serves as an initial step in understanding whether and how dietary shifts may influence viral dynamics in bats, which alters the risk of spillover to humans. 

Bats are reservoirs of many zoonotic viruses that are fatal in humans but do not cause disease in bats. Moreover, bats generate low neutralizing antibody titers in response to experimental viral infection, although more robust antibody responses have been observed in wild-caught bats during times of food stress. Here, we compared the antibody titers and B cell receptor (BCR) diversity of Jamaican fruit bats (Artibeus jamaicensis; JFBs) and BALB/c mice generated in response to T-dependent and T-independent antigens. We then manipulated the diet of JFBs and challenged them with H18N11 influenza A-like virus or a replication incompetent Nipah virus VSV (Nipah-riVSV). Under standard housing conditions, JFBs generated a lower avidity antibody response and possessed more BCR mRNA diversity compared to BALB/c mice. However, withholding protein from JFBs improved serum neutralization in response to Nipah-riVSV and improved serum antibody titers specific to H18 but reduced BCR mRNA diversity. 

Abstract Understanding the drivers of seasonal disease outbreaks remains a fundamental challenge in disease ecology. Periodic outbreaks can be driven by several seasonally varying factors, including pulses of susceptible individuals through births, changes in host behaviour and social aggregation and variation in host immunity. However, when these potential drivers overlap temporally, isolating their relative contributions to outbreak patterns becomes challenging.We studied Hendra virus, a zoonotic pathogen with seasonal spillovers from bats to horses and humans. Multiple seasonal factors have been hypothesized to drive Hendra virus transmission, including food shortages, birth pulses and changes in host aggregation, but their temporal overlap has made identifying primary drivers difficult.We conducted a 4‐year longitudinal study ofPteropusbats to test whether seasonal birth pulses and the resulting influx of susceptible juveniles drive Hendra virus transmission. Using a Bayesian ageing model, we aged sexually immature bats and placed them into birth cohorts. We used our age predictions to model how viral shedding and antibody responses changed as bats aged. We trackedBartonellaspp. Infection—a bacterial pathogen requiring close contact for transmission—as an indicator of transmission opportunities within each cohort for comparison.We found no evidence that seasonal birth pulses of immunologically naïve juveniles drove Hendra virus transmission. Two out of three cohorts showed substantially reduced maternal antibody transfer compared to the 2018 cohort, with seroprevalence near zero at our earliest sampling timepoints and showed no clear evidence of synchronized seroconversion. Furthermore,Bartonellainfection rates were consistent across cohorts, indicating that opportunities for pathogen transmission remained consistent across cohorts despite varying viral shedding patterns.Our findings demonstrate that birth pulses alone cannot explain observed patterns of Hendra virus outbreaks. These results highlight the importance of using multiple lines of evidence to evaluate competing mechanisms underlying seasonal disease dynamics, particularly when potential drivers coincide temporally. 

Influenza D viruses (IDV) are known to co-circulate with viral and bacterial pathogens in cattle and other ruminants. Currently, there is limited knowledge regarding host responses to IDV infection and whether IDV infection affects host susceptibility to secondary bacterial infections. To begin to address this gap in knowledge, the current study utilized a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches to evaluate host cellular responses against primary IDV infection and secondary bacterial infection with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Primary IDV infection in mice did not result in clinical signs of disease and it did not enhance the susceptibility to secondary S. aureus infection. Rather, IDV infection appeared to protect mice from the usual clinical features of secondary bacterial infection, as demonstrated by improved weight loss, survival, and recovery when compared to S. aureus infection alone. We found a notable increase in IFN-β expression following IDV infection while utilizing human alveolar epithelial A549 cells to analyze early anti-viral responses to IDV infection. These results demonstrate for the first time that IDV infection does not increase the susceptibility to secondary bacterial infection with S. aureus, with evidence that anti-viral immune responses during IDV infection might protect the host against these potentially deadly outcomes.