skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Siders, Adam_C"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. ABSTRACT Emerging aquatic insects can be an important resource subsidy for a variety of terrestrial consumers, including spiders, birds, bats and lizards. Emergence flux is influenced by a variety of abiotic and biotic variables, such as temperature, drying, and predators and these variables can also control the body size of emergent insects. Despite their importance, these variables can change rapidly during drought conditions as water temperatures rise, surface area decreases and predator densities increase.During 2018, the Konza Prairie Biological Station experienced a record drought: flow ceased in the lower reaches of Kings Creek for the first time in over 40 years of observation, leaving a series of isolated pools. We studied how the drought affected aquatic insect emergence in 12 of these pools via elevated temperatures, decreased surface area, and concentration of predators (e.g. fishes and crayfish) over a four‐week period. We returned in 2020 and sampled emergence in the same pools over 2 weeks under non‐drought conditions to compare emergence between drought and non‐drought conditions.We found three overall patterns: (1) rates of areal emergence abundance and biomass (number or mg DM m−2d−1) did not differ between drought and non‐drought conditions. In contrast, pool‐scale emergence abundance, but not biomass (number or mg DM pool−1d−1), was lower during drought conditions; (2) average midge body size was larger during the drought relative to the non‐drought conditions; (3) environmental variables (e.g. temperature, pool surface area, predator biomass) were not predictive of emergence during drought and non‐drought conditions.Fewer, but larger emergent midges (as seen under drought conditions) may represent a higher quality resource for terrestrial consumers than many smaller midges due to increased per‐capita energy yield. However, due to the overall decrease in water availability throughout the stream network, the overall emergence flux was concentrated in reaches with remaining water during the drought, making pools emergence subsidy hotspots. Overall, these contrasting responses underscore the complex nature of community responses to shifting climatic conditions. 
    more » « less