Search for: All records

Gene knock‐out (KO) mouse models for DNA polymerase beta (Polβ) revealed that loss of Polβ leads to neonatal lethality, highlighting the critical organismic role for this DNA polymerase. While biochemical analysis and gene KO cell lines have confirmed its biochemical role in base excision repair and in TET‐mediated demethylation, more long‐lived mouse models continue to be developed to further define its organismic role. ThePolb‐KO mouse was the first of the Cre‐mediated tissue‐specific KO mouse models. This technology was exploited to investigate roles for Polβ in V(D)J recombination (variable‐diversity‐joining rearrangement), DNA demethylation, gene complementation, SPO11‐induced DNA double‐strand break repair, germ cell genome stability, as well as neuronal differentiation, susceptibility to genotoxin‐induced DNA damage, and cancer onset. The revolution in knock‐in (KI) mouse models was made possible by CRISPR/cas9‐mediated gene editing directly in C57BL/6 zygotes. This technology has helped identify phenotypes associated with germline or somatic mutants of Polβ. Such KI mouse models have helped uncover the importance of key Polβ active site residues or specific Polβ enzyme activities, such as thePolb^Y265Cmouse that develops lupus symptoms. More recently, we have used this KI technology to mutate thePolbgene with two codon changes, yielding thePolb^L301R/V303Rmouse. In this KI mouse model, the expressed Polβ protein cannot bind to its obligate heterodimer partner, Xrcc1. Although the expressed mutant Polβ protein is proteolytically unstable and defective in recruitment to sites of DNA damage, the homozygousPolb^L301R/V303Rmouse is viable and fertile, yet small in stature. We expect that this and additional targeted mouse models under development are poised to reveal new biological and organismic roles for Polβ.

 

Protein poly-ADP-ribosylation (PARylation) is a post-translational modification formed by transfer of successive units of ADP-ribose to target proteins to form poly-ADP-ribose (PAR) chains. PAR plays a critical role in the DNA damage response (DDR) by acting as a signaling platform to promote the recruitment of DNA repair factors to the sites of DNA damage that bind via their PAR-binding domains (PBDs). Several classes of PBD families have been recognized, which identify distinct parts of the PAR chain. Proteins encoding PBDs play an essential role in conveying the PAR-mediated signal through their interaction with PAR chains, which mediates many cellular functions, including the DDR. The WWE domain identifies the iso-ADP-ribose moiety of the PAR chain. We recently described the WWE domain of RNF146 as a robust genetically encoded probe, when fused to EGFP, for detection of PAR in live cells. Here, we evaluated other PBD candidates as molecular PAR probes in live cells, including several other WWE domains and an engineered macrodomain. In addition, we demonstrate unique PAR dynamics when tracked by different PAR binding domains, a finding that that can be exploited for modulation of the PAR-dependent DNA damage response.

 

This Special Issue (SI) of Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis (EMM), entitled “Inspiring Basic and Applied Research in Genome Integrity Mechanisms,” is to update the community on recent findings and advances on genome integrity mechanisms with emphasis on their importance for basic and environmental health sciences. This SI includes two research articles, one brief research communication, and four reviews that highlight cutting edge research findings and perspectives, from both established leaders and junior trainees, on DNA repair mechanisms. In particular, the authors provided an updated understanding on several distinct enzymes (e.g., DNA polymerase beta, DNA polymerase theta, DNA glycosylase NEIL2) and the associated molecular mechanisms in base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, and microhomology‐mediated end joining of double‐strand breaks. In addition, genome‐wide sequencing analysis or site‐specific mutational signature analysis of DNA lesions from environmental mutagens (e.g., UV light and aflatoxin) provide further characterization and sequence context impact of DNA damage and mutations. This SI is dedicated to the legacy of Dr. Samuel H. Wilson from the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences at the National Institutes of Health.

 

The earliest methods of genome editing, such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFN) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), utilize customizable DNA-binding motifs to target the genome at specific loci. While these approaches provided sequence-specific gene-editing capacity, the laborious process of designing and synthesizing recombinant nucleases to recognize a specific target sequence, combined with limited target choices and poor editing efficiency, ultimately minimized the broad utility of these systems. The discovery of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat sequences (CRISPR) in Escherichia coli dates to 1987, yet it was another 20 years before CRISPR and the CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins were identified as part of the microbial adaptive immune system, by targeting phage DNA, to fight bacteriophage reinfection. By 2013, CRISPR/Cas9 systems had been engineered to allow gene editing in mammalian cells. The ease of design, low cytotoxicity, and increased efficiency have made CRISPR/Cas9 and its related systems the designer nucleases of choice for many. In this review, we discuss the various CRISPR systems and their broad utility in genome manipulation. We will explore how CRISPR-controlled modifications have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms of genome stability, using the modulation of DNA repair genes as examples.