Search for: All records

Abstract Diagnosing the role of internal variability over recent decades is critically important for both model validation and projections of future warming. Recent research suggests that for 1980–2022 internal variability manifested as Global Cooling and Arctic Warming (i‐GCAW), leading to enhanced Arctic Amplification (AA), and suppressed global warming over this period. Here we show that such an i‐GCAW is rare in CMIP6 large ensembles, but simulations that do produce similar i‐GCAW exhibit a unique and robust internally driven global surface air temperature (SAT) trend pattern. This unique SAT trend pattern features enhanced warming in the Barents and Kara Sea and cooling in the Tropical Eastern Pacific and Southern Ocean. Given that these features are imprinted in the observed record over recent decades, this work suggests that internal variability makes a crucial contribution to the discrepancy between observations and model‐simulated forced SAT trend patterns. 

Abstract Since 1980, the Arctic surface has warmed four times faster than the global mean. Enhanced Arctic warming relative to the global average warming is referred to as Arctic Amplification (AA). While AA is a robust feature in climate change simulations, models rarely reproduce the observed magnitude of AA, leading to concerns that models may not accurately capture the response of the Arctic to greenhouse gas emissions. Here, we use CMIP6 data to train a machine learning algorithm to quantify the influence of internal variability in surface air temperature trends over both the Arctic and global domains. Application of this machine learning algorithm to observations reveals that internal variability increases the Arctic warming but slows global warming in recent decades, inflating AA since 1980 by 38% relative to the externally forced AA. Accounting for the role of internal variability reconciles the discrepancy between simulated and observed AA. 

Abstract An observationally based global climatology of the temperature diurnal cycle in the lower stratosphere is derived from 11 different satellites with global positioning system–radio occultation (GPS-RO) measurements from 2006 to 2020. Methods used in our analysis allow for accurate characterization of global stratospheric temperature diurnal cycles, even in the high latitudes where the diurnal signal is small but longer time-scale variability is large. A climatology of the synthetic Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU) and Advanced MSU (AMSU) Temperature in the Lower Stratosphere (TLS) is presented to assess the accuracy of diurnal cycle climatologies for the MSU and AMSU TLS observations, which have traditionally been generated by model data. The TLS diurnal ranges are typically less than 0.4 K in all latitude bands and seasons investigated. It is shown that the diurnal range (maximum minus minimum temperature) of TLS is largest over Southern Hemisphere tropical land in the boreal winter season, indicating the important role of deep convection. The range, phase, and seasonality of the TLS diurnal cycle are generally well captured by the WACCM6 simulation and ERA5 dataset. We also present an observationally based diurnal cycle climatology of temperature profiles from 300 to 10 hPa for various latitude bands and seasons and compare the ERA5 data with the observations.