Search for: All records

Abstract High fracture density in fault damage zones not only reduces the elastic stiffness of rocks but may also promote time‐dependent bulk deformation through the sliding of fracture and thus alter the stress in fault zones. On comparing the damage zones of the three faults in the Chelungpu fault system encountered in the Taiwan Chelungpu fault Drilling Project (TCDP), the youngest damage zone showed pronounced sonic velocity reduction even though fracture density is the same for all three fault zones, consistent with the shorter time for velocity recovery in the youngest fault. Caliper log data showed a time‐dependent enlargement of the borehole wall at the damage zone. These damage zones record lower differential stress than the surrounding host rock, which cannot be explained by the reduced elastic stiffness in the damage zone. Stress relaxation caused by time‐dependent bulk deformation in the damage zone may be responsible for the observed low differential stress. 

Abstract Understanding the stress state before and after an earthquake is essential to study how stress on faults evolves during the seismic cycle. This study integrates wellbore failure analysis, laboratory experiments, and edge dislocation model to study the stress state before and after the Chi‐Chi earthquake. The post‐earthquake in‐situ stress state observed along boreholes of the Taiwan Chelungpu‐fault Drilling Project (TCDP) is heterogeneous due to lithological variations. Along the borehole, we observe that drilling‐induced tensile fractures are only present in sandstones, whereas breakouts are mostly present in silt‐rich rocks. Laboratory experiments on TCDP cores also show that tensile and compressive strength are weaker in sandstones than in silt‐rich rocks. These observations imply that both maximum and minimum horizontal principal stresses are higher in silt‐rich intervals. Extended leak‐off tests in the TCDP borehole also show lower minimum horizontal stress in sand‐rich intervals, consistent with the above observations. We combine these observations to estimate a profile of stress magnitudes along the well which explains the variability of stress states found in previous studies. The stress heterogeneity we observed underlines the importance of acknowledging the spatial scale that the stress data represent. We then use an edge dislocation model constrained by GPS surface displacements obtained during Chi‐Chi earthquake to calculate the coseismic stress changes. Our inferred pre‐earthquake stress magnitudes, obtained by subtracting the coseismic stress change from the post‐earthquake stress, suggest subcritical stress state before the earthquake despite the large displacements observed during the Chi‐Chi earthquake in the region where TCDP encountered the fault.