Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
The air–sea exchange and oceanic cycling of greenhouse gases (GHG), including carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2), are fundamental in controlling the evolution of the Earth’s atmospheric chemistry and climate. Significant advances have been made over the last 10 years in understanding, instrumentation and methods, as well as deciphering the production and consumption pathways of GHG in the upper ocean (including the surface and subsurface ocean down to approximately 1000 m). The global ocean under current conditions is now well established as a major sink for CO2, a major source for N2O and a minor source for both CH4 and CO. The importance of the ocean as a sink or source of NOx is largely unknown so far. There are still considerable uncertainties about the processes and their major drivers controlling the distributions of N2O, CH4, CO, and NOx in the upper ocean. Without having a fundamental understanding of oceanic GHG production and consumption pathways, our knowledge about the effects of ongoing major oceanic changes—warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and eutrophication—on the oceanic cycling and air–sea exchange of GHG remains rudimentary at best. We suggest that only through a comprehensive, coordinated, and interdisciplinary approach that includes data collection by global observation networks as well as joint process studies can the necessary data be generated to (1) identify the relevant microbial and phytoplankton communities, (2) quantify the rates of ocean GHG production and consumption pathways, (3) comprehend their major drivers, and (4) decipher economic and cultural implications of mitigation solutions.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract. In the current era of rapid climate change, accuratecharacterization of climate-relevant gas dynamics – namely production,consumption, and net emissions – is required for all biomes, especially thoseecosystems most susceptible to the impact of change. Marine environmentsinclude regions that act as net sources or sinks for numerous climate-activetrace gases including methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Thetemporal and spatial distributions of CH4 and N2O are controlledby the interaction of complex biogeochemical and physical processes. Toevaluate and quantify how these mechanisms affect marine CH4 andN2O cycling requires a combination of traditional scientificdisciplines including oceanography, microbiology, and numerical modeling.Fundamental to these efforts is ensuring that the datasets produced byindependent scientists are comparable and interoperable. Equally critical istransparent communication within the research community about the technicalimprovements required to increase our collective understanding of marineCH4 and N2O. A workshop sponsored by Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry (OCB)was organized to enhance dialogue and collaborations pertaining tomarine CH4 and N2O. Here, we summarize the outcomes from theworkshop to describe the challenges and opportunities for near-futureCH4 and N2O research in the marine environment.more » « less
-
Abstract. Large-scale climatic forcing is impactingoceanic biogeochemical cycles and is expected to influence the water-columndistribution of trace gases, including methane and nitrous oxide. Our abilityas a scientific community to evaluate changes in the water-column inventoriesof methane and nitrous oxide depends largely on our capacity to obtain robustand accurate concentration measurements that can be validated acrossdifferent laboratory groups. This study represents the first formalinternational intercomparison of oceanic methane and nitrous oxidemeasurements whereby participating laboratories received batches of seawatersamples from the subtropical Pacific Ocean and the Baltic Sea. Additionally,compressed gas standards from the same calibration scale were distributed tothe majority of participating laboratories to improve the analytical accuracyof the gas measurements. The computations used by each laboratory to derivethe dissolved gas concentrations were also evaluated for inconsistencies(e.g., pressure and temperature corrections, solubility constants). Theresults from the intercomparison and intercalibration provided invaluableinsights into methane and nitrous oxide measurements. It was observed thatanalyses of seawater samples with the lowest concentrations of methane andnitrous oxide had the lowest precisions. In comparison, while the analyticalprecision for samples with the highest concentrations of trace gases wasbetter, the variability between the different laboratories was higher:36% for methane and 27% for nitrous oxide. In addition, thecomparison of different batches of seawater samples with methane and nitrousoxide concentrations that ranged over an order of magnitude revealed theramifications of different calibration procedures for each trace gas.Finally, this study builds upon the intercomparison results to developrecommendations for improving oceanic methane and nitrous oxide measurements,with the aim of precluding future analytical discrepancies betweenlaboratories.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
