Search for: All records

Abstract Seismicity during explosive volcanic eruptions remains challenging to observe through the eruptive noise, leaving first‐order questions unanswered. How do earthquake rates change as eruptions progress, and what is their relationship to the opening and closing of the eruptive vent? To address these questions for the Okmok Volcano 2008 explosive eruption, Volcano Explosivity Index 4, we utilized modern detection methods to enhance the existing earthquake catalog. Our enhanced catalog detected significantly more earthquakes than traditional methods. We located, relocated, determined magnitudes and classified all events within this catalog. Our analysis reveals distinct behaviors for long‐period (LP) and volcano‐tectonic (VT) earthquakes, providing insights into the opening and closing cycle. LP earthquakes occur as bursts beneath the eruptive vent and do not coincide in time with the plumes, indicating their relationship to an eruptive process that occurs at a high pressurization state, that is, partially closed conduit. In contrast, VT earthquakes maintain a steadier rate over a broader region, do not track the caldera deflation and have a largerb‐value during the eruption than before or after. The closing sequence is marked by a burst of LPs followed by small VTs south of the volcano. The opening sequence differs as only VTs extend to depth and migrate within minutes of the eruption onset. Our high‐resolution catalog offers valuable insights, demonstrating that volcanic conduits can transition between partially closed (clogged) and open (cracked) states during an eruption. Utilizing modern earthquake processing techniques enables clearer understanding of eruptions and holds promise for studying other volcanic events. 

Abstract By providing unrivaled resolution in both time and space, volcano seismicity helps to chronicle and interpret eruptions. Standard earthquake detection methods are often insufficient as the eruption itself produces continuous seismic waves that obscure earthquake signals. We address this problem by developing an earthquake processing workflow specific to a high‐noise volcanic environment and applying it to the explosive 2008 Okmok Volcano eruption. This process includes applying single‐channel template matching combined with machine‐learning and fingerprint‐based techniques to expand the existing earthquake catalog of the eruption. We detected an order of magnitude more earthquakes, then located, relocated, determined locally calibrated magnitudes, and classified the events in the enhanced catalog. This new high‐resolution earthquake catalog increases the number of observations by about a factor of 10 and enables the detailed spatiotemporal seismic analysis during a large eruption.