Search for: All records

Abstract The offset between Earth's magnetic and rotational axes introduces a diurnal dependence in the high‐latitude EUV exposure of the northern hemisphere (NH) and southern hemisphere (SH). This variation raises the question: Does the Universal Time (UT) of geomagnetic storm onset impact its geospace consequences? To address this question, we used the Multiscale Atmosphere‐Geospace Environment (MAGE) model to simulate the 10 October 2024, geomagnetic storm—the year's second strongest (SYM‐H minimum of −346 nT). Since the storm occurred near equinox, we did not expect, but found, significant interhemispheric asymmetries in magnetosphere‐ionosphere‐thermosphere (M‐I‐T) coupling parameters such as the cross‐polar cap potential, hemispherically integrated field‐aligned current, and hemispheric power of electron precipitation. Controlled simulations show that interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and solar wind have negligible effects on these asymmetries, whereas the EUV variation arising from the diurnal dipole tilt produces noticeable interhemispheric differences. Coincidentally, during this storm, IMFB_zturned southward when the SH was tilted toward the Sun, and it maintained this orientation for 12 hr. A controlled simulation with storm onset shifted by 12 hr exhibits a substantial reduction in interhemispheric asymmetry. Differences in integrated Joule heating power and the SML/SMU indices also occurred with the shifted onset, underscoring the importance of UT in stormtime magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. 

A new version of the US National Science Foundation National Center forAtmospheric Research (NSF NCAR) thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamicsgeneral circulation model (TIEGCM) has been developed and released. Thispaper describes the changes and improvements of the new version 3.0since its last major release (2.0) in 2016. These include: 1) increasingthe model resolution in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions, aswell as the ionospheric dynamo solver; 2) upward extension of the modelupper boundary to enable more accurate simulations of the topsideionosphere and neutral density in the lower exosphere; 3) improvedparameterization for thermal electron heating rate; 4) resolvingtransport of minor species N(2D); 5) treating helium as a major species;6) parameterization for additional physical processes, such as SAPS andelectrojet turbulent heating; 7) including parallel ion drag in theneutral momentum equation; 8) nudging of prognostic fields near thelower boundary from external data; 9) modification to the NO reactionrate and auroral heating rate; 10) outputs of diagnostic analysis termsof the equations; 11) new functionalities enabling model simulations ofcertain recurrent phenomena, such as solar flares and eclipse. Wepresent examples of the model validation during a moderate storm andcompare simulation results by turning on/off new functionalities todemonstrate the related new model capabilities. Furthermore, the modelis upgraded to comply with the new computer software environment at NSFNCAR for easy installation and run setup and with new visualizationtools. Finally, the model limitations and future development plans arediscussed. 

Abstract Ultra‐low frequency (ULF) waves are a ubiquitous carrier of energy in geospace. However, their efficiency in transferring solar wind energy into the upper atmosphere remains a fundamental and not well‐understood question. This is due to their global presence, which cannot be fully quantified by spatially limited observations, and the need for self‐consistent global modeling to account for their dependence on dynamic, inhomogeneous magnetic fields and plasma densities. In this study we use a purely global magnetohydrodynamic model to investigate energy inputs to the ionosphere in the form of Poynting flux. Oscillations in solar wind dynamic pressure excite field line resonances in the magnetosphere. The total Alfvénic Poynting flux entering the ionosphere can be comparable to the total quasi‐steady Poynting flux under northward interplanetary magnetic field. The efficiency of this energy transfer via ULF waves depends on the driving frequency of the solar wind and the ionospheric Pedersen conductance. 

Abstract A new version of the US National Science Foundation National Center for Atmospheric Research (NSF NCAR) thermosphere‐ionosphere‐electrodynamics general circulation model (TIEGCM) has been developed and released. This paper describes the changes and improvements of the new version (3.0) since its last major release (2.0) in 2016. These include: (a) increasing the model resolution in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions, as well as in the ionospheric dynamo solver; (b) upward extension of the model upper boundary to enable more accurate simulations of the topside ionosphere and neutral density in the lower exosphere; (c) improved parameterization for thermal electron heating rate; (d) resolving transport of minor species N(²D); (e) treating helium as a major species; (f) parameterization for additional physical processes, such as SAPS and electrojet turbulent heating; (g) including parallel ion drag in the neutral momentum equation; (h) nudging of prognostic fields near the lower boundary from external data; (i) modification to the NO reaction rate and auroral heating rate; (j) outputs of diagnostic analysis terms of the equations; (k) new functionalities enabling model simulations of certain recurrent phenomena, such as solar flares and eclipses. We present examples of the model validation during a moderate storm and compare simulation results by turning on/off new functionalities to demonstrate the related new model capabilities. Furthermore, the model was upgraded to comply with the new computer software environment at NSF NCAR for easy installation and run setup and with new visualization tools. Finally, the model limitations and future development plans are discussed.