Search for: All records

Satellite-based evapotranspiration (ET) products inform decision-making regarding water availability and plant water use from sub-field to watershed scales. These products are validated using eddy covariance flux towers, where observations are subject to the influence of landscape heterogeneity due to a constantly shifting contributing area, or flux footprint, governed by surface and atmospheric drivers. In agricultural regions with multiple crop types, local heterogeneity may amplify the importance of appropriate grid cell selection for satellite ET comparisons. We evaluate the extent to which different satellite ET products capture both ET magnitudes and spatial variability due to landscape heterogeneity. We compare ECOSTRESS 70m instantaneous and daily ET products to flux tower observations in central Illinois with measurements at two heights, representing different but overlapping flux footprint areas. We estimate satellite ET based on a flux footprint weighting, gridded averages around the tower, and for crop-specific corn or soybean grid cells. In this region, the disALEXI daily ET product has better overall performance relative to the PT-JPL daily product, which is more sensitive to overpass times and tends to overestimate instantaneous ET. However, the PT-JPL model reflects more variability at high spatial resolution. Specifically, a footprint-derived ET improves the data-model comparison relative to disALEXI, and PT-JPL more closely replicates crop-specific and field-specific differences as inferred from the 2-height experimental setup. This study highlights differences in how models integrate spatial inputs, which lead to different representations of spatial variability for the same nominal resolution. This can also have important implications for understanding and predicting field-level differences in land-atmosphere fluxes.