skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Bonacina, Maria Paola"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Pientka, Brigitte ; Tinelli, Cesare (Ed.)
    This paper presents and proves totally correct a new algorithm, called QSMA, for the satisfiability of a quantified formula modulo a complete theory and an initial assignment. The optimized variant of implemented in YicesQS is described and shown to preserve total correctness. A report on the performance of YicesQS at the 2022 SMT competition is included. YicesQS ran in the LIA, NIA, LRA, NRA, and BV categories and ranked second for the “largest contribution” award (single queries). It was the only solver to solve all LRA instances, where it was about two orders of magnitude faster than the second best solver (Z3). 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available September 1, 2024
  2. Deharbe, David ; Hyvarinen, Antti E. (Ed.)
    CDSAT (Conflict-Driven Satisfiability) is a paradigm for theory combination that works by coordinating theory modules to reason in the union of the theories in a conflict-driven manner. We generalize CDSAT to the case of nondisjoint theories by presenting a new CDSAT theory module for a theory of arrays with abstract length, which is an abstraction of the theory of arrays with length. The length function is a bridging function as it forces theories to share symbols, but the proposed abstraction limits the sharing to one predicate symbol. The CDSAT framework handles shared predicates with minimal changes, and the new module satisfies the CDSAT requirements, so that completeness is preserved. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Search-based satisfiability procedures try to build a model of the input formula by simultaneously proposing candidate models and deriving new formulae implied by the input.Conflict-drivenprocedures perform non-trivial inferences only when resolving conflicts between formulæ and assignments representing the candidate model. CDSAT (Conflict-Driven SATisfiability) is a method for conflict-driven reasoning inunions of theories. It combines inference systems for individual theories astheory moduleswithin a solver for the union of the theories. This article augments CDSAT with a more generallemma learningcapability and withproof generation. Furthermore, theory modules for several theories of practical interest are shown to fulfill the requirements forcompletenessandterminationof CDSAT. Proof generation is accomplished by aproof-carryingversion of the CDSAT transition system that producesproof objectsin memory accommodating multiple proof formats. Alternatively, one can apply to CDSAT theLCF approach to proofsfrom interactive theorem proving, by defining a kernel of reasoning primitives that guarantees the correctness by construction of CDSAT proofs.

     
    more » « less