Search for: All records

Both trans and cis iron–CTMC complexes, namely, trans -dichlorido[(5 SR ,7 RS ,12 RS ,14 SR )-5,7,12,14-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane]iron(III) tetrachloridoferrate, [Fe(C 14 H 32 N 4 )Cl 2 ][FeCl 4 ] ( 1a ), the analogous chloride methanol monosolvate, [Fe(C 14 H 32 N 4 )Cl 2 ]Cl·CH 3 OH ( 1b ), and cis -dichlorido[(5 SR ,7 RS ,12 SR ,14 RS )-5,7,12,14-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane]iron(III) chloride, [Fe(C 14 H 32 N 4 )Cl 2 ]Cl ( 2 ), were successfully synthesized and structurally characterized using X-ray diffraction. The coordination geometry of the macrocycle is dependent on the stereoisomerism of CTMC. The packing of these complexes appears to be strongly influenced by extensive hydrogen-bonding interactions, which are in turn determined by the nature of the counter-anions ( 1a versus 1b ) and/or the coordination geometry of the macrocycle ( 1a/1b versus 2 ). These observations are extended to related ferric cis - and trans- dichloro macrocyclic complexes. 

The new compound [(NC)Ru 2 (ap) 4 ] 2 (μ-1,4-C 6 H 4 ) (ap = 2-anilinopyridinate) was prepared to address the open question of whether a 1,4-phenylene bridge can mediate intermetallic electronic coupling. As a manifestation of strong coupling, hole delocalization between the Ru 2 centers on the IR time scale (10 −14 s) was established using spectroelectrochemistry. An orbital mechanism for coupling was elaborated with DFT analysis. 

Reported herein are the two new series of diruthenium aryl compounds: Ru 2 (DiMeOap) 4 (Ar) (1a–6a) (DiMeOap = 2-(3,5-dimethoxyanilino)pyridinate) and Ru 2 ( m - i PrOap) 4 (Ar) (1b–5b) ( m - i PrOap = 2-(3-iso-propoxyanilino)pyridinate), prepared through the lithium-halogen exchange reaction with a variety of aryl halides (Ar = C 6 H 4 -4-NMe 2 (1), C 6 H 4 -4- t Bu (2), C 6 H 4 -4-OMe (3), C 6 H 3 -3,5-(OMe) 2 (4), C 6 H 4 -4-CF 3 (5), C 6 H 5 (6)). The molecular structures of these compounds were established with X-ray diffraction studies. Additionally, these compounds were characterized using electronic absorption and voltammetric techniques. Compounds 1a–6a and 1b–5b are all in the Ru 2 5+ oxidation state, with a ground state configuration of σ 2 π 4 δ 2 (π*δ*) 3 ( S = 3/2). Use of the modified ap ligands (ap′) resulted in moderate increases of product yield when compared to the unsubstituted Ru 2 (ap) 4 (Ar) (ap = 2-anilinopyridinate) series. Comparisons of the electrochemical properties of 1a–6a and 1b–5b against the Ru 2 (ap′)Cl starting material reveals the addition of the aryl ligand cathodically shifted the Ru 2 6+/5+ oxidation and Ru 2 5+/4+ reduction potentials. These oxidation and reductions potentials are also strongly dependent on the p -substituent of the axial aryl ligands.