skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Veitch, John"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract

    We present an improved version of the nested sampling algorithmnessaiin which the core algorithm is modified to use importance weights. In the modified algorithm, samples are drawn from a mixture of normalising flows and the requirement for samples to be independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.) according to the prior is relaxed. Furthermore, it allows for samples to be added in any order, independently of a likelihood constraint, and for the evidence to be updated with batches of samples. We call the modified algorithmi-nessai. We first validatei-nessaiusing analytic likelihoods with known Bayesian evidences and show that the evidence estimates are unbiased in up to 32 dimensions. We comparei-nessaito standardnessaifor the analytic likelihoods and the Rosenbrock likelihood, the results show thati-nessaiis consistent withnessaiwhilst producing more precise evidence estimates. We then testi-nessaion 64 simulated gravitational-wave signals from binary black hole coalescence and show that it produces unbiased estimates of the parameters. We compare our results to those obtained using standardnessaianddynestyand find thati-nessairequires 2.68 and 13.3 times fewer likelihood evaluations to converge, respectively. We also testi-nessaiof an 80 s simulated binary neutron star signal using a reduced-order-quadrature basis and find that, on average, it converges in 24 min, whilst only requiring1.01×106likelihood evaluations compared to1.42×106fornessaiand4.30×107fordynesty. These results demonstrate thati-nessaiis consistent withnessaianddynestywhilst also being more efficient.

     
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)