Search for: All records

Large-eddy simulations (LESs) of low-Reynolds-number flow (Re=50,000) over a NACA0018 airfoil are performed to investigate flow control at the stall angle of attack (15 deg) by low-amplitude surface waves (actuations) of different types (backward/forward traveling and standing waves) on the airfoil’s suction side. It is found that the backward (toward downstream) traveling waves, inspired from aquatic swimmers, are more effective than forward traveling and standing wave actuations. The results of simulations show that a backward traveling wave with a reduced frequency f∗=4 (f∗=fL/U, where f is frequency; L, chord length; and U, free flow velocity), a nondimensional wavelength λ∗=0.2 (λ∗=λ/L, where λ is dimensional wavelength), and a nondimensional amplitude a∗=0.002 (a∗=a/L, where a is dimensional amplitude) can suppress stall. In contrast, the flow over the airfoil with either standing or forward traveling wave actuations separates from the leading edge similar to the baseline. Consequently, the backward traveling wave creates the highest lift-to-drag ratio. For traveling waves at a higher amplitude (a∗=0.008), however, the shear layer becomes unstable from the actuation point and creates periodic coherent structures. Therefore, the lift coefficient decreases compared with the low-amplitude case. 

Some anguilliform swimmers such as eels and lampreys swim near the ground, which has been hypothesized to have hydrodynamic benefits. To investigate whether swimming near ground has hydrodynamics benefits, two large-eddy simulations of a self-propelled anguilliform swimmer are carried out—one swimming far away from the ground (free swimming) and the other near the ground, that is, midline at 0.07 of fish length (L) from the ground creating a gap of 0.04 L . Simulations are carried out under similar conditions with both fish starting from rest in a quiescent flow and reaching steady swimming (constant average speed). The numerical results show that both swimmers have similar speed, power consumption, efficiency, and wake structure during steady swimming. This indicates that swimming near the ground with a gap larger than 0.04 L does not improve the swimming performance of anguilliform swimmers when there is no incoming flow, that is, the interaction of the wake with the ground does not improve swimming performance. When there is incoming flow, however, swimming near the ground may help because the flow has lower velocities near the ground.