Search for: All records

Automated program repair holds the potential to significantly reduce software maintenance effort and cost. However, recent studies have shown that it often produces low-quality patches that repair some but break other functionality. We hypothesize that producing patches by replacing likely faulty regions of code with semantically-similar code fragments, and doing so at a higher level of granularity than prior approaches can better capture abstraction and the intended specification, and can improve repair quality. We create SOSRepair, an automated program repair technique that uses semantic code search to replace candidate buggy code regions with behaviorally-similar (but not identical) code written by humans. SOSRepair is the first such technique to scale to real-world defects in real-world systems. On a subset of the ManyBugs benchmark of such defects, SOSRepair produces patches for 23 (35%) of the 65 defects, including 3, 5, and 8 defects for which previous state-of-the-art techniques Angelix, Prophet, and GenProg do not, respectively. On these 23 defects, SOSRepair produces more patches (8, 35%) that pass all independent tests than the prior techniques. We demonstrate a relationship between patch granularity and the ability to produce patches that pass all independent tests. We then show that fault localization precision is a key factor in SOSRepair's success. Manually improving fault localization allows SOSRepair to patch 24 (37%) defects, of which 16 (67%) pass all independent tests. We conclude that (1) higher-granularity, semantic-based patches can improve patch quality, (2) semantic search is promising for producing high-quality real-world defect repairs, (3) research in fault localization can significantly improve the quality of program repair techniques, and (4) semi-automated approaches in which developers suggest fix locations may produce high-quality patches. 

System configuration languages provide powerful abstractions that simplify managing large-scale, networked systems. Thousands of organizations now use configuration languages, such as Puppet. However, specifications written in configuration languages can have bugs and the shell remains the simplest way to debug a misconfigured system. Unfortunately, it is unsafe to use the shell to fix problems when a system configuration language is in use: a fix applied from the shell may cause the system to drift from the state specified by the configuration language. Thus, despite their advantages, configuration languages force system administrators to give up the simplicity and familiarity of the shell. This paper presents a synthesis-based technique that allows administrators to use configuration languages and the shell in harmony. Administrators can fix errors using the shell and the technique automatically repairs the higher-level specification written in the configuration language. The approach (1) produces repairs that are consistent with the fix made using the shell; (2) produces repairs that are maintainable by minimizing edits made to the original specification; (3) ranks and presents multiple repairs when relevant; and (4) supports all shells the administrator may wish to use. We implement our technique for Puppet, a widely used system configuration language, and evaluate it on a suite of benchmarks under 42 repair scenarios. The top-ranked repair is selected by humans 76% of the time and the human-equivalent repair is ranked 1.31 on average.