Search for: All records

Abstract Coupled U‐Pb and trace‐element analyses of accessory phases in crustal xenoliths from the Late Devonian Udachnaya kimberlite (Siberian craton, Russia) are used to constrain Moho temperature and crustal heat production at the time of kimberlite eruption. Rutile and apatite in lower‐crustal garnet granulites record U‐Pb dates that extend from 1.8 Ga to 360 Ma (timing of kimberlite eruption). This contrasts with upper‐crustal tonalites and amphibolites that contain solely Paleoproterozoic apatite. Depth profiling of rutile from the lower‐crustal xenoliths show that U‐Pb dates increase gradually from rim to core over μm‐scale distances, with slower‐diffusing elements (e.g., Al) increasing in concentration across similar length‐scales. The U‐Pb and trace element gradients in rutile are incompatible with partial Pb loss during slow cooling, but are consistent with neocrystallization and re‐heating of the lower crust for <1 Myr prior to eruption. Because Paleoproterozoic rutile and apatite dates are preserved, we infer that long‐term ambient lower‐crustal temperatures before this thermal perturbation were cooler than the Pb closure temperature of rutile and probably apatite (<400°C). The lower‐crustal temperature bounds from these data are consistent with pressure‐temperature arrays of Udachnaya peridotite xenoliths that suggest relatively cool geothermal gradients, signifying that the mantle xenoliths accurately capture the thermal state of the lithosphere prior to eruption. Combined, the xenolith data imply low crustal heat production for the Siberian craton (∼0.3 μW/m³). Nevertheless, such values produce surface heat flow values of 20–40 mW/m², higher than measured around Udachnaya (average 19 mW/m²), suggesting that the surface heat flow measurements are inaccurate. 

In situ apatite U-Pb petrochronology and Sr-Nd isotope geochemistry requires well-characterized and matrix-matched references materials (RMs), yet only a few suitable apatite RMs are currently available. To ameliorate this issue, we determined the U-Pb, Sm-Nd, and Sr isotopic and elemental compositions of a suite of prospective apatite RMs using isotope dilution (ID) TIMS and laser ablation (LA) ICP-MS. The two RMs, from Morocco (MRC-1) and Brazil (BRZ-1), are cm-sized and available in significant quantities. The U-Pb ID-TIMS data yield an isochron age of 153.3 ± 0.2 Ma for MRC-1. This age is consistent with laser ablation split stream ICP-MS (LASS) analyses that produce an isochron age of 152.7 ± 0.6 Ma. The weighted mean of ID-TIMS analyses for 143Nd/144Nd analyses is 0.512677 ± 3, for 147Sm/144Nd is 0.10923 ± 9, and for 87Sr/86Sr is 0.707691 ± 2. The range and mean of TIMS Sm-Nd isotopic data are reproducible by LA-ICP-MS, but laser ablation Sr data are consistently offset towards more radiogenic values. For BRZ-1 apatite, ID-TIMS U-Pb analyses are dispersed, but a subset of the data yields a coherent age intercept of 2078 ± 13 Ma. The vast majority of LASS spot transects across the apatite produce an isochron that define a younger age of 2038 ± 14 Ma. We interpret this as incorporation of cryptic, younger altered domains within BRZ-1. Discordant U-Pb spot analyses are associated with chemically distinct cracks, likely a result of fluid infiltration. The weighted means of ID-TIMS analyses of BRZ-1 yield 143Nd/144Nd = 0.510989 ± 5, 147Sm/144Nd = 0.10152 ± 8, and 87Sr/86Sr = 0.709188 ± 3. The distribution of Nd isotopic compositions of this RM measured by LA-MC-ICP-MS analyses are comparable to TIMS analyses. By contrast, 87Sr/86Sr measurements by LA-ICP-MS are inaccurate and exhibit large uncertainties, but this RM can be useful for empirically correcting in situ 87Sr/86Sr measurements. The data indicate that MRC-1 apatite may serve well as a U-Pb, Sm-Nd, and Sr RM, whereas BRZ-1 apatite has the most potential as a Sm-Nd RM. These potential RMs provide new benchmarks for in situ apatite chemical analyses and inter-laboratory calibrations.