Search for: All records

Abstract BackgroundDNA transposable elements are mobilized by a “cut and paste” mechanism catalyzed by the binding of one or more transposase proteins to terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) to form a transpositional complex. Study of the rice genome indicates that themPingelement has experienced a recent burst in transposition compared to the closely relatedPingandPongelements. A previously developed yeast transposition assay allowed us to probe the role of both internal and terminal sequences in the mobilization of these elements. ResultsWe observed thatmPingand a syntheticmPongelement have significantly higher transposition efficiency than the related autonomousPingandPongelements. Systematic mutation of the internal sequences of bothmPingandmPongidentified multiple regions that promote or inhibit transposition. Simultaneous alteration of single bases on bothmPingTIRs resulted in a significant reduction in transposition frequency, indicating that each base plays a role in efficient transposase binding. Testing chimericmPingandmPongelements verified the important role of both the TIRs and internal regulatory regions.Previous experiments showed that the G at position 16, adjacent to the 5′ TIR, allows mPingto have higher mobility. Alteration of the 16th and 17th base frommPing’s3′ end or replacement of the 3′ end withPong3′ sequences significantly increased transposition frequency. ConclusionsAs the transposase proteins were consistent throughout this study, we conclude that the observed transposition differences are due to the element sequences. The presence of sub-optimal internal regions and TIR bases supports a model in which transposable elements self-limit their activity to prevent host damage and detection by host regulatory mechanisms. Knowing the role of the TIRs, adjacent sub-TIRs, and internal regulatory sequences allows for the creation of hyperactive elements. 

Introduction: Class II DNA transposable elements account for significant portions of eukaryotic genomes and contribute to genome evolution through their mobilization. To escape inactivating mutations and persist in the host genome over evolutionary time, these elements must be mobilized enough to result in additional copies. These elements utilize a “cut and paste” transposition mechanism that does not intrinsically include replication. However, elements such as the rice derived mPing element have been observed to increase in copy number over time. Methods: We used yeast transposition assays to test several parameters that could affect the excision and insertion of mPing and its related elements. This included development of novel strategies for measuring element insertion and sequencing insertion sites. Results: Increased transposase protein expression increased the mobilization frequency of a small (430 bp) element, while overexpression inhibition was observed for a larger (7,126 bp) element. Smaller element size increased both the frequency of excision and insertion of these elements. The effect of yeast ploidy on element excision, insertion, and copy number provided evidence that homology dependent repair allows for replicative transposition. These elements were found to preferentially insert into yeast rDNA repeat sequences. Discussion: Identifying the parameters that influence transposition of these elements will facilitate their use for gene discovery and genome editing. These insights in to the behavior of these elements also provide important clues into how class II transposable elements have shaped eukaryotic genomes. 

The plant-specific RNA Polymerase V (Pol V) plays a key role in gene silencing, but its role in repair of double stranded DNA breaks is unclear. Excision of the transposable element mPing creates double stranded breaks that are repaired by NHEJ. We measured mPing excision site repair in multiple DNA methylation mutants including pol V using an mPing:GFP reporter. Two independent mutant alleles of pol V showed less GFP expression, indicating that the Pol V protein plays a role in excision site repair. Sequence analysis of the pol V excision sites indicated an elevated rate of large deletions consistent with less efficient repair. These results clarify the role of Pol V, but not other RNA-directed DNA methylation proteins (Pol IV) or maintenance DNA methylation pathways (MET1), in the repair of double-strand DNA breaks.