skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • Home
  • Search Results
  • Page 1 of 1

Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 1655281

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. (, Research Handbook on Modern Legal Realism)
    The new legal realist movement seeks to foster inter-disciplinary studies that combine the best of legal scholarship and the social sciences. This goal is laudable but results can vary. Sometimes fresh eyes and different skills discover new insights and avenues of inquiry, but sometimes scholars imperfectly translate theory, methods or data from outside their fields. In other instances, progress is piecemeal, as scholars cobble together substantive findings across theoretically and methodologically diverse work that address complementary questions and topics. The accumulation of empirical insights can be useful but falls short of a theoretically integrated, inter-disciplinary research agenda. 
    more » « less
    Accepted Manuscript Full Text Available
  2. (, Studies in law politics and society)
    Litigation is part of the American policymaking playbook as diverse groups routinely turn to courts to pursue their agendas. All of this litigation raises questions about its consequences. This essay examines the literature on the political risks of litigation. It argues that this literature identifies four potential risks - crowd out, path dependence, backlash, and individualization - but offers less insight into the likelihood of these risks in practice. It ends by offering suggestions about how to advance our understanding of when litigation casts a negative political shadow in the current age of judicialization. 
    more » « less
    Full Text Available 
  3. (, Laws)
    Full Text Available 
  4. ; (, Law & Social Inquiry)