Search for: All records

Abstract Temperature impacts a wide range of mating behaviors, particularly in ectothermic organisms that tend to have body temperatures similar to ambient thermal conditions. Here, we test the effects of thermal variation on precopulatory and copulatory behavior in the harvesterLeiobunum politumWeed 1889, which belongs to the group commonly known as daddy longlegs. We ran single choice mating trials across temperatures commonly experienced in the field during the mating season (18–34°C) for 2 years. We tested how temperature affected the likelihood to move, attempt to mate, and successfully mate, as well as the duration of copulation. Mating was highest at low to intermediate temperatures, and the temperature at which peak mating rates occurred varied across years. The wide range of temperatures across whichL. politumis found to mate reflects thermal variability in the field and the flexibility in mating behavior in this fascinating animal. 

Abstract Temperature influences the expression of a wide range of behavioral traits in ectotherms, including many involved in the initiation of pair formation and mating. Although opportunities to mate are thought to be greatest when male and female activity overlap, sex‐specific behaviors and physiology could result in mismatched thermal optima for male and female courtship. Here, we investigate how conflicts in the thermal sensitivity of male and female courtship activity affect patterns of mating across temperatures inEnchenopa binotatatreehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). These plant‐feeding insects coordinate mating with plant‐borne vibrational signals exchanged in male–female duets prior to pair formation. We manipulated temperature across an ecologically relevant range (18–36ºC) and tested the likelihood of individual male and femaleE. binotatato engage in courtship activity using vibrational playbacks. We then staged male–female mating interactions across the same temperature range and quantified the thermal sensitivity of mating‐related behaviors across stages of mating. Specifically, we measured the timing of duetting, the likelihood for key pre‐copulatory behaviors to occur, whether the pair mated, and copulation duration. We found sex‐specific thermal sensitivity in courtship activity: Males showed a clear peak of activity at intermediate temperatures (27–30ºC), while females showed highest activity at the hotter thermal extreme. Mating rates, courtship duets, and copulatory attempts were less likely to occur at thermal extremes. Also, duetting occurred earlier and copulation was shortest at higher temperatures. Overall, our data suggest that sexes differ in how temperature affects mating‐related activity and some processes involved in mate coordination may be more sensitive than others across variable thermal environments. 

Abstract Variation in temperature can affect the expression of a variety of important fitness‐related behaviours, including those involved with mate attraction and selection, with consequences for the coordination of mating across variable environments. We examined how temperature influences the expression of male mating signals and female mate preferences—as well as the relationship between how male signals and female mate preferences change across temperatures (signal–preference temperature coupling)—inEnchenopa binotatatreehoppers. These small plant‐feeding insects communicate using plantborne vibrations, and our field surveys indicate they experience significant natural variation in temperature during the mating season. We tested for signal–preference temperature coupling in four populations ofE. binotataby manipulating temperature in a controlled laboratory environment. We measured the frequency of male signals—the trait for which females show strongest preference—and female peak preference—the signal frequency most preferred by females—across a range of biologically relevant temperatures (18°C–36°C). We found a strong effect of temperature on both male signals and female preferences, which generated signal–preference temperature coupling within each population. Even in a population in which male signals mismatched female preferences, the temperature coupling reinforces predicted directional selection across all temperatures. Additionally, we found similar thermal sensitivity in signals and preferences across populations even though populations varied in the mean frequency of male signals and female peak preference. Together, these results suggest that temperature variation should not affect the action of sexual selection via female choice, but rather should reinforce stabilizing selection in populations with signal–preference matches, and directional selection in those with signal–preference mismatches. Finally, we do not predict that thermal variation will disrupt the coordination of mating in this species by generating signal–preference mismatches at thermal extremes.