Search for: All records

This study examined how incorporating art into an upper-level undergraduate field-based ecology research course influenced students’ communication and collaboration skills, their career goals, and how they conceptualized the scientific method. Student pairs designed an independent research study that used artwork and a scientific research poster to disseminate their findings at an end-of-term exhibit. Students enrolled in either a local or a (subsidized) travel abroad section of the course. Students in both sections found new or deeper connections between art and science, developed a more sophisticated understanding of the science method, became more confident with their science skills, and reported an expanded perspective on their future careers (often including field work and a wider geographic job search). Science–art student teams indicated they wanted more opportunities for collaborative work in the future, and that their final products were more professional due to their collaborations, as compared to science–science teams. Additionally, the travel abroad students benefitted from experiencing new ecosystems and cultures, from working with science and art professionals from other countries, and from working in an isolated field station without distractions. 

Soil mesofauna play pertinent roles in soil processes. For example, microarthropods strongly influence rates of microbial decomposition. The relationship between mesofauna and their environment are understudied in low Arctic ecosystems compared to other regions. A more detailed grasp of these soil assemblages is necessary for understanding the current functioning of these ecosystems. We characterized the soil mesofauna community across different low Arctic habitats to determine which soil properties commonly correlated with soil fauna would best explain their distribution, abundance, and diversity. Samples were taken near five different lakes in northern Finland, in both alpine meadows and sub-alpine birch forests, across a span of available soil habitats (measured by pH, salinity, organic and nitrogen content, soil moisture). Total abundance of the mesofauna community was influenced by a combination of soil factors, but most individual taxa, as well as measures of diversity were best explained by models of one or two influential soil parameters. Poduromorpha springtails and Oribatid mites were best modeled by measures of resource availability, although only Oribatids were significantly, positively related to these resources. All mites and Entomobryomorphid springtails were positively influenced by physicochemical soil moisture and/or salinity. Salinity, in particular, had a strong influence on overall mesofauna community composition. Our results provide further insight into soil fauna assemblages in Northern Finland and further, more extensive research would contribute to a more comprehensive foundation. This will allow for better monitoring of community changes and responses in the face of climate change in the low Arctic. 

The polar regions are among the most biologically constrained in the world, characterized by cold temperatures and reduced liquid water. These limitations make them among the most climate-sensitive regions on Earth. Despite the overwhelming constraints from low temperatures and resource availability, many polar ecosystems, including polar deserts and tundras across the Arctic and Antarctic host uniquely diverse microbial communities. Polar regions have warmed more rapidly than the global average, with continued warming predicted for the future, which will reduce constraints on soil microbial activity. This could alter polar carbon (C) cycles, increasing CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. The objective of this study was to determine how increased temperature and moisture availability impacts microbial respiration in polar regions, by focusing on a diversity of ecosystem types (polar desert vs. tundra) that are geographically distant across Antarctica and the Arctic. We found that polar desert soil microbes were co-limited by temperature and moisture, though C and nitrogen (N) mineralization were only stimulated at the coldest and driest of the two polar deserts. Only bacterial biomass was impacted at the less harsh of the polar deserts, suggesting microbial activity is limited by factors other than temperature and moisture. Of the tundra sites, only the Antarctic tundra was climate-sensitive, where increased temperature decreased C and N mineralization while water availability stimulated it. The greater availability of soil resources and vegetative biomass at the Arctic tundra site might lead to its lack of climate-sensitivity. Notably, while C and N dynamics were climate-sensitive at some of our polar sites, P availability was not impacted at any of them. Our results demonstrate that soil microbial processes in some polar ecosystems are more sensitive to changes in temperature and moisture than others, with implications for soil C and N storage that are not uniformly predictable across polar regions.