Search for: All records

Polarized growth drives the morphogenesis of elongated cellular structures. In plants, polarized growth depends on actin and a tip focused ionic calcium gradient. How the calcium gradient is maintained remains unclear. We discovered that autoinhibitory calcium ATPases (ACAs) redundantly contribute to the steepness of the calcium gradient. ACA1 and ACA2 localize to the subapical plasma membrane and ACA5 to the vacuole membrane, providing spatial regulation of calcium efflux. Tip-growing plant cells also exhibit apical calcium fluctuations. Even though Δaca1/2/5 cells have a diminished calcium gradient, they exhibit normal fluctuations and actin but have significantly reduced apical secretion. Furthermore, cells lacking apical actin retain a strong calcium gradient but have reduced apical secretion. Suppression of both the calcium gradient and apical actin dramatically impairs growth, supporting a model where two independent and parallel processes, the calcium gradient and apical actin, promote rapid polarized growth. 

Similar to cellulose synthases (CESAs), cellulose synthase–like D (CSLD) proteins synthesize β-1,4-glucan in plants. CSLDs are important for tip growth and cytokinesis, but it was unknown whether they form membrane complexes in vivo or produce microfibrillar cellulose. We produced viable CESA-deficient mutants of the mossPhyscomitrium patensto investigate CSLD function without interfering CESA activity. Microscopy and spectroscopy showed that CESA-deficient mutants synthesize cellulose microfibrils that are indistinguishable from those in vascular plants. Correspondingly, freeze-fracture electron microscopy revealed rosette-shaped particle assemblies in the plasma membrane that are indistinguishable from CESA-containing rosette cellulose synthesis complexes (CSCs). Our data show that proteins other than CESAs, most likely CSLDs, produce cellulose microfibrils inP. patensprotonemal filaments. The data suggest that the specialized roles of CSLDs in cytokinesis and tip growth are based on differential expression and different interactions with microtubules and possibly Ca²⁺, rather than structural differences in the microfibrils they produce.