Search for: All records

Abstract Aerosol from the Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai (HT‐HH) volcanic eruption (20.6°S) in January 2022 were not incorporated into the austral polar vortex until the following year, March 2023. Within the polar vortex in situ profiles of aerosol size spectra were completed in the austral autumns of 2019 and 2023, from McMurdo Station, Antarctica (78˚S), 30 months prior to and 15 months after the HT‐HH eruption. The measurements indicate that the HT‐HH impact on aerosol size was primarily confined to particles with diameters >0.5 μm leading to differences in aerosol mass, surface area, and extinction from factors of 2–4 at the volcanic layer's peak below 20 km, increasing to ratios of 5–10 above 20 km. Effective radius, with radiative and microphysical implications, increased from ∼0.2 to ∼0.3 μm. An Earth system model with a modal aerosol package compares favorably with the in situ measurements of the HT‐HH aerosol impact. 

Abstract The Stratospheric Total Aerosol Counter (STAC) is a lightweight balloon‐borne instrument that utilizes condensational growth techniques to measure the total aerosol concentration. STAC is a miniaturized version of the legacy Wyoming condensation particle counter that operated from 1974 through 2020 in the middle latitudes and polar regions, with a few measurements in the tropics. Here we provide a description of the STAC instrument and the total aerosol measurement record, demonstrating that typical total aerosol profiles exhibit a peak in number mixing ratio, with values between 800 and 2,000 particles per mg of air (mg⁻¹), just below the lapse rate tropopause (LRT). In the tropics and middle latitudes, mixing ratios decrease above the LRT likely due to coagulation and scavenging that results in a transfer of mass to the fewer but larger aerosol particles of the Junge layer. Exceptions to this occur in the spring time in the middle latitudes where a new particle layer between 20 and 25 km is frequently observed. In the poles, total aerosol profiles exhibit two distinct features: new particle formation in austral spring, and an increasing mixing ratio above 17 km likely due to the presence of meteoric smoke that has been concentrated within the polar vortex. High observed stratospheric particle mixing ratios, in excess of 2,000 mg⁻¹, are observed in the polar new particle layer and at the top of polar profiles. 

Abstract Macroscopic stratospheric aerosol properties such as surface area density (SAD) and volume density (VD) are required by modern chemistry climate models. These quantities are in continuous need of validation by observations. Direct observation of these parameters is not possible, but they can be derived from optical particle counters (OPCs) which provide concentration (number density) and size distributions of aerosol particles, and possibly from ground‐based and satellite‐borne lidar observations of particle backscatter coefficients and aerosol type. When such measurements are obtained simultaneously by OPCs and lidars, they can be used to calculate backscatter and extinction coefficients, as well as SAD and VD. Empirical relations can thus be derived between particle backscatter coefficient, extinction coefficient, and SAD and VD for a variety of aerosols (desert dust, maritime aerosols, stratospheric aerosols) and be used to approximate SAD and VD from lidar measurements. Here we apply this scheme to coincident measurements of polar stratospheric clouds above McMurdo Station, Antarctica, by ground‐based lidar and balloon‐borne OPCs. The relationships derived from these measurements will provide a means to obtain values of SAD and VD for supercooled ternary solutions (STS) and nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) PSCs from the backscatter coefficients measured by lidar. Coincident lidar and OPC measurements provided 15 profile comparisons. Empirical expressions of SAD and VD as a function of particle backscatter coefficient,β, were calculated from fits of the form log(SAD/VD) = A + Blog(β) usingβfrom the lidar and SAD/VD from the OPC. The PSCs were classified as STS and NAT mixtures, ice being absent. 

Abstract. Scattering codes are used to study the optical properties of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs). Particle backscattering and depolarization coefficients can be computed with available scattering codes once the particle size distribution (PSD) is known and a suitable refractive index is assumed. However, PSCs often appear as external mixtures of supercooled ternary solution (STS) droplets, solid nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) and possibly ice particles, making the assumption of a single refractive index and a single morphology to model the scatterers questionable.Here we consider a set of 15 coincident measurements of PSCs above McMurdo Station, Antarctica, using ground-based lidar, a balloon-borne optical particle counter (OPC) and in situ observations taken by a laser backscattersonde and OPC during four balloon stratospheric flights from Kiruna, Sweden. This unique dataset of microphysical and optical observations allows us to test the performances of optical scattering models when both spherical and aspherical scatterers of different composition and, possibly, shapes are present. We consider particles as STS if their radius is below a certain threshold value Rth and NAT or possibly ice if it is above it. The refractive indices are assumed known from the literature. Mie scattering is used for the STS, assumed spherical. Scattering from NAT particles, considered spheroids of different aspect ratio (AR), is treated with T-matrix results where applicable. The geometric-optics–integral-equation approach is used whenever the particle size parameter is too large to allow for a convergence of the T-matrix method.The parameters Rth and AR of our model have been varied between 0.1 and 2 µm and between 0.3 and 3, respectively, and the calculated backscattering coefficient and depolarization were compared with the observed ones. The best agreement was found for Rth between 0.5 and 0.8 µm and for AR less than 0.55 and greater than 1.5.To further constrain the variability of AR within the identified intervals, we have sought an agreement with the experimental data by varying AR on a case-by-case basis and further optimizing the agreement by a proper choice of AR smaller than 0.55 and greater than 1.5 and Rth within the interval 0.5 and 0.8 µm. The ARs identified in this way cluster around the values 0.5 and 2.5.The comparison of the calculations with the measurements is presented and discussed. The results of this work help to set limits to the variability of the dimensions and asphericity of PSC solid particles, within the limits of applicability of our model based on the T-matrix theory of scattering and on assumptions on a common particle shape in a PSD and a common threshold radius for all the PSDs. 

Abstract. A comparison of polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) occurrence from 2006 to2010 is presented, as observed from the ground-based lidar station at McMurdo(Antarctica) and by the satellite-borne CALIOP lidar (Cloud-Aerosol Lidarwith Orthogonal Polarization) measuring over McMurdo. McMurdo (Antarctica) isone of the primary lidar stations for aerosol measurements of the NDACC (Network forDetection of Atmospheric Climate Change). The ground-based observations havebeen classified with an algorithm derived from the recent v2 detection andclassification scheme, used to classify PSCs observed by CALIOP. A statistical approach has been used to compare ground-based and satellite-based observations, since point-to-point comparison is often troublesome dueto the intrinsic differences in the observation geometries and the imperfectoverlap of the observed areas. A comparison of space-borne lidar observations and a selection of simulationsobtained from chemistry–climate models (CCMs) has been made by using a series ofquantitative diagnostics based on the statistical occurrence of different PSCtypes. The distribution of PSCs over Antarctica, calculated by severalCCMVal-2 and CCMI chemistry–climate models has been compared with the PSCcoverage observed by the satellite-borne CALIOP lidar. The use of severaldiagnostic tools, including the temperature dependence of the PSCoccurrences, evidences the merits and flaws of the different models. Thediagnostic methods have been defined to overcome (at least partially) thepossible differences due to the resolution of the models and to identifydifferences due to microphysics (e.g., the dependence of PSC occurrence onT−T_NAT). A significant temperature bias of most models has been observed, as well as alimited ability to reproduce the longitudinal variations in PSC occurrencesobserved by CALIOP. In particular, a strong temperature bias has been observedin CCMVal-2 models with a strong impact on PSC formation. The WACCM-CCMI(Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model – Chemistry-Climate ModelInitiative) model compares rather well with the CALIOP observations, althougha temperature bias is still present.