Search for: All records

Recent advances in monocular depth estimation have been made by incorporating natural language as additional guidance. Although yielding impressive results the impact of the language prior particularly in terms of generalization and robustness remains unexplored. In this paper we address this gap by quantifying the impact of this prior and introduce methods to benchmark its effectiveness across various settings. We generate "low-level" sentences that convey object-centric three-dimensional spatial relationships incorporate them as additional language priors and evaluate their downstream impact on depth estimation. Our key finding is that current language-guided depth estimators perform optimally only with scene-level descriptions and counter-intuitively fare worse with low level descriptions. Despite leveraging additional data these methods are not robust to directed adversarial attacks and decline in performance with an increase in distribution shift. Finally to provide a foundation for future research we identify points of failures and offer insights to better understand these shortcomings. With an increasing number of methods using language for depth estimation our findings highlight the opportunities and pitfalls that require careful consideration for effective deployment in real-world settings. 

The ability to understand visual concepts and replicate and compose these concepts from images is a central goal for computer vision. Recent advances in text-to-image (T2I) models have lead to high definition and realistic image quality generation by learning from large databases of images and their descriptions. However, the evaluation of T2I models has focused on photorealism and limited qualitative measures of visual understanding. To quantify the ability of T2I models in learning and synthesizing novel visual concepts (a.k.a. personalized T2I), we introduce ConceptBed, a large-scale dataset that consists of 284 unique visual concepts, and 33K composite text prompts. Along with the dataset, we propose an evaluation metric, Concept Confidence Deviation (CCD), that uses the confidence of oracle concept classifiers to measure the alignment between concepts generated by T2I generators and concepts contained in target images. We evaluate visual concepts that are either objects, attributes, or styles, and also evaluate four dimensions of compositionality: counting, attributes, relations, and actions. Our human study shows that CCD is highly correlated with human understanding of concepts. Our results point to a trade-off between learning the concepts and preserving the compositionality which existing approaches struggle to overcome. The data, code, and interactive demo is available at: https://conceptbed.github.io/