Search for: All records

Abstract Cancer initiation and progression are typically associated with the accumulation of driver mutations and genomic instability. However, recent studies demonstrated that cancer can also be driven purely by epigenetic alterations, without driver mutations. Specifically, a 24-h transient downregulation ofpolyhomeotic(ph-KD), a core component of the Polycomb complex PRC1, is sufficient to induce epigenetically initiated cancers (EICs) inDrosophila, which are proficient in DNA repair and characterized by a stable genome. Whether genomic instability eventually occurs when PRC1 downregulation is performed for extended periods of time remains unclear. Here, we show that prolonged depletion of PH, which mimics cancer initiating events, results in broad dysregulation of DNA replication and repair genes, along with the accumulation of DNA breaks, defective repair, and widespread genomic instability in the cancer tissue. A broad misregulation of H2AK118 ubiquitylation and to a lesser extent of H3K27 trimethylation also occurs and might contribute to these phenotypes. Together, this study supports a model where DNA repair and replication defects accumulate during the tumorigenic transformation epigenetically induced by PRC1 loss, resulting in genomic instability and cancer progression. 

SUMMARY Phase separation forms membraneless compartments in the nuclei, including by establishing heterochromatin “domains” and repair foci. Pericentromeric heterochromatin mostly comprises repeated sequences prone to aberrant recombination, and “safe” homologous recombination (HR) repair of these sequences requires the movement of repair sites to the nuclear periphery before Rad51 recruitment and strand invasion. How this mobilization initiates is unknown, and the contribution of phase separation to these dynamics is unclear. Here, we show that Nup98 nucleoporin is recruited to heterochromatic repair sites before relocalization through Sec13 or Nup88 nucleoporins, and downstream from the Smc5/6 complex and SUMOylation. Remarkably, the phase separation properties of Nup98 are required and sufficient to mobilize repair sites and exclude Rad51, thus preventing aberrant recombination while promoting HR repair. Disrupting this pathway results in heterochromatin repair defects and widespread chromosome rearrangements, revealing a novel “off-pore” role for nucleoporins and phase separation in nuclear dynamics and genome integrity in a multicellular eukaryote. HighlightsNup88 and Sec13 recruit Nup98 to heterochromatic DSBs downstream from Smc5/6Nup88, Sec13 and Nup98 promote repair focus mobilization in heterochromatin ‘off-pore’Nup98 excludes Rad51 from repair sites inside the heterochromatin domainPhase separation by Nup98 is required and sufficient for relocalization and Rad51 exclusion 

Abstract Although cancer initiation and progression are generally associated with the accumulation of somatic mutations^1,2, substantial epigenomic alterations underlie many aspects of tumorigenesis and cancer susceptibility^3–6, suggesting that genetic mechanisms might not be the only drivers of malignant transformation⁷. However, whether purely non-genetic mechanisms are sufficient to initiate tumorigenesis irrespective of mutations has been unknown. Here, we show that a transient perturbation of transcriptional silencing mediated by Polycomb group proteins is sufficient to induce an irreversible switch to a cancer cell fate inDrosophila. This is linked to the irreversible derepression of genes that can drive tumorigenesis, including members of the JAK–STAT signalling pathway andzfh1, the fly homologue of theZEB1oncogene, whose aberrant activation is required for Polycomb perturbation-induced tumorigenesis. These data show that a reversible depletion of Polycomb proteins can induce cancer in the absence of driver mutations, suggesting that tumours can emerge through epigenetic dysregulation leading to inheritance of altered cell fates. 

Abstract Cells rapidly respond to replication stress actively slowing fork progression and inducing fork reversal. How replication fork plasticity is achieved in the context of nuclear organization is currently unknown. Using nuclear actin probes in living and fixed cells, we visualized nuclear actin filaments in unperturbed S phase and observed their rapid extension in number and length upon genotoxic treatments, frequently taking contact with replication factories. Chemically or genetically impairing nuclear actin polymerization shortly before these treatments prevents active fork slowing and abolishes fork reversal. Defective fork remodeling is linked to deregulated chromatin loading of PrimPol, which promotes unrestrained and discontinuous DNA synthesis and limits the recruitment of RAD51 and SMARCAL1 to nascent DNA. Moreover, defective nuclear actin polymerization upon mild replication interference induces chromosomal instability in a PRIMPOL-dependent manner. Hence, by limiting PrimPol activity, nuclear F-actin orchestrates replication fork plasticity and is a key molecular determinant in the rapid cellular response to genotoxic treatments. 

Nuclear actin filaments (F-actin) form during S-phase and in response to replication stress to promote fork remodeling and repair. In mild replication stress conditions, nuclear actin polymerization is required to limit PrimPol recruitment to the fork while promoting fork reversal. Both short and long filaments form during this response, but their function in the nuclear dynamics of replication sites was unclear. Here, we show that replication centers associated with long nuclear actin filaments become more mobile than the rest of the forks, suggesting relocalization of replication sites as a response to prolonged fork stalling and/or fork breakage, even in response to mild replication stress. 

Nuclear actin filaments (F-actin) form during S-phase and in response to replication stress to promote fork remodeling and repair. In mild replication stress conditions, nuclear actin polymerization is required to limit PrimPol recruitment to the fork while promoting fork reversal. Both short and long filaments form during this response, but their function in the nuclear dynamics of replication sites was unclear. Here, we show that replication centers associated with long nuclear actin filaments become more mobile than the rest of the forks, suggesting relocalization of replication sites as a response to prolonged fork stalling and/or fork breakage, even in response to mild replication stress. 

Pericentromeric heterochromatin mostly comprises repeated DNA sequences prone to ectopic recombination. In Drosophila cells, ‘safe’ homologous recombination repair requires relocalization of heterochromatic repair sites to the nuclear periphery before Rad51 recruitment and strand invasion. DSBs are anchored to the nuclear periphery through the Nup107/160 nucleoporin complex. Previous studies suggested that the nuclear pore ‘basket’ protein Nup153 could also mediate anchoring, but Nup153 RNAi depletion also affects Nup107 association with the pores, preventing a direct assessment of Nup153 role. Using a separation of function mutant, here we show that Nup153 is not required for anchoring heterochromatic DSBs to the nuclear periphery. 

Pericentromeric heterochromatin is highly enriched for repetitive sequences prone to aberrant recombination. Previous studies showed that homologous recombination (HR) repair is uniquely regulated in this domain to enable ‘safe’ repair while preventing aberrant recombination. In Drosophila cells, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) relocalize to the nuclear periphery through nuclear actin-driven directed motions before recruiting the strand invasion protein Rad51 and completing HR repair. End-joining (EJ) repair also occurs with high frequency in heterochromatin of fly tissues, but how alternative EJ (alt-EJ) pathways operate in heterochromatin remains largely uncharacterized. Here, we induce DSBs in single euchromatic and heterochromatic sites using a new system that combines the DR-white reporter and I-SceI expression in spermatogonia of flies. Using this approach, we detect higher frequency of HR repair in heterochromatin, relative to euchromatin. Further, sequencing of mutagenic repair junctions reveals the preferential use of different EJ pathways across distinct euchromatic and heterochromatic sites. Interestingly, synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining (SD-MMEJ) appears differentially regulated in the two domains, with a preferential use of motifs close to the cut site in heterochromatin relative to euchromatin, resulting in smaller deletions. Together, these studies establish a new approach to study repair outcomes in fly tissues, and support the conclusion that heterochromatin uses more HR and less mutagenic EJ repair relative to euchromatin. 

Pericentromeric heterochromatin is mostly composed of repetitive DNA sequences prone to aberrant recombination. Cells have developed highly specialized mechanisms to enable ‘safe’ homologous recombination (HR) repair while preventing aberrant recombination in this domain. Understanding heterochromatin repair responses is essential to understanding the critical mechanisms responsible for genome integrity and tumor suppression. Here, we review the tools, approaches, and methods currently available to investigate double-strand break (DSB) repair in pericentromeric regions, and also suggest how technologies recently developed for euchromatin repair studies can be adapted to characterize responses in heterochromatin. With this ever-growing toolkit, we are witnessing exciting progress in our understanding of how the ‘dark matter’ of the genome is repaired, greatly improving our understanding of genome stability mechanisms.