skip to main content


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 1800294

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract

    In this paper we provide a complete local well-posedness theory for the free boundary relativistic Euler equations with a physical vacuum boundary on a Minkowski background. Specifically, we establish the following results: (i) local well-posedness in the Hadamard sense, i.e., local existence, uniqueness, and continuous dependence on the data; (ii) low regularity solutions: our uniqueness result holds at the level of Lipschitz velocity and density, while our rough solutions, obtained as unique limits of smooth solutions, have regularity only a half derivative above scaling; (iii) stability: our uniqueness in fact follows from a more general result, namely, we show that a certain nonlinear functional that tracks the distance between two solutions (in part by measuring the distance between their respective boundaries) is propagated by the flow; (iv) we establish sharp, essentially scale invariant energy estimates for solutions; (v) a sharp continuation criterion, at the level of scaling, showing that solutions can be continued as long as the velocity is in$$L^1_t Lip$$Lt1Lipand a suitable weighted version of the density is at the same regularity level. Our entire approach is in Eulerian coordinates and relies on the functional framework developed in the companion work of the second and third authors on corresponding non relativistic problem. All our results are valid for a general equation of state$$p(\varrho )= \varrho ^\gamma $$p(ϱ)=ϱγ,$$\gamma > 1$$γ>1.

     
    more » « less
  2. Proving local well-posedness for quasi-linear problems in partial differential equations presents a number of difficulties, some of which are universal and others of which are more problem specific. On one hand, a common standard for what well-posedness should mean has existed for a long time, going back to Hadamard. On the other hand, in terms of getting there, there are by now both many variations—and also many misconceptions. The aim of these expository notes is to collect a number of both classical and more recent ideas in this direction, and to assemble them into a cohesive roadmap that can be then adapted to the reader’s problem of choice. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)