skip to main content


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 1812933

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. null (Ed.)
  2. null (Ed.)
  3. To represent motions from a mechanical point of view, this paper explores motion embedding using the motion taxonomy. With this taxonomy, manipulations can be described and represented as binary strings called motion codes. Motion codes capture mechanical properties, such as contact type and trajectory, that should be used to define suitable distance metrics between motions or loss functions for deep learning and reinforcement learning. Motion codes can also be used to consolidate aliases or cluster motion types that share similar properties. Using existing data sets as a reference, we discuss how motion codes can be created and assigned to actions that are commonly seen in activities of daily living based on intuition as well as real data. Motion codes are compared to vectors from pre-trained Word2Vec models, and we show that motion codes maintain distances that closely match the reality of manipulation. 
    more » « less
  4. Humans perform the task of pouring often and in which exhibit consistent accuracy regardless of the complicated dynamics of the liquid. Model predictive control (MPC) appears to be a natural candidate solution for the task of accurate pouring considering its wide use in industrial applications. However, MPC requires the model of the system in question. Since an accurate model of the liquid dynamics is difficult to obtain, the usefulness of MPC for the pouring task is uncertain. In this work, we model the dynamics of water using a recurrent neural network (RNN), which enables the use of MPC for pouring control. We evaluated our RNN-enabled MPC controller using a physical system we made ourselves and averaged a pouring error of 16.4 mL over 5 different source containers. We also compared our controller with a baseline switch controller and showed that our controller achieved a much higher accuracy than the baseline controller. 
    more » « less