Search for: All records

Abstract Oral drug products have become indispensable in modern medicine because of their exceptional patient compliance. However, poor bioavailability of ubiquitous low‐water‐soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and lack of efficient oral drug formulations remain as significant challenges. Nanocrystalline formulations are an attractive route to increase API solubility, but typically require abrasive mechanical milling and several processing steps to create an oral dosage form. Using the dual amphiphilic and thermoresponsive properties of methylcellulose (MC), a new thermogelling nanoemulsion and a facile thermal dripping method are developed for efficient formulation of composite particles with the MC matrix embedded with precisely controlled API nanocrystals. Moreover, a fast and tunable release performance is achieved with the combination of a fast‐eroding MC matrix and fast‐dissolving API nanocrystals. Using the versatile thermal processing approach, the thermogelling nanoemulsion is easily formulated into a wide variety of dosage forms (nanoparticle suspension, drug tablet, and oral thin film) in a manner that avoids nanomilling. Overall, the proposed thermogelling nanoemulsion platform not only broadens the applications of thermoresponsive nanoemulsions but also shows great promise for more efficient formulation of oral drug products with high quality and tunable fast release. 

Dispersions of dielectric and paramagnetic nanoparticles polarize in response to an external electric or magnetic field and can form chains or other ordered structures depending on the strength of the applied field. The mechanical properties of these materials are of interest for a variety of applications; however, computational studies in this area have so far been limited. In this work, we derive expressions for two important properties for dispersions of polarizable spherical particles with dipoles induced by a uniform external field—the isothermal stress tensor and the pressure. Numerical calculations of these quantities, evaluated using a spectrally accurate Ewald summation method, are validated using thermodynamic integration. We also compare the stress obtained using the mutual dipole model, which accounts for the mutual polarization of particles, to the stress expected from calculations using a fixed dipole model, which neglects mutual polarization. We find that as the conductivity of the particles increases relative to the surrounding medium, the fixed dipole model does not accurately describe the dipolar contribution to the stress. The thermodynamic pressure, calculated from the trace of the stress tensor, is compared to the virial expression for the pressure, which is simpler to calculate but inexact. We find that the virial pressure and the thermodynamic pressure differ, especially in suspensions with a high volume fraction of particles.