skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 1908033

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. A recent large deflection cantilever model is considered. The principal nonlinear effects come through the beam’s  inextensibility —local arc length preservation—rather than traditional extensible effects attributed to fully restricted boundary conditions. Enforcing inextensibility leads to:  nonlinear stiff- ness  terms, which appear as quasilinear and semilinear effects, as well as  nonlinear inertia  effects, appearing as nonlocal terms that make the beam implicit in the acceleration.In this paper we discuss the derivation of the equations of motion via Hamilton’s principle with a Lagrange multiplier to enforce the  effective inextensibility constraint . We then provide the functional framework for weak and strong solutions before presenting novel results on the existence and uniqueness of strong solutions. A distinguishing feature is that the two types of nonlinear terms prevent independent challenges: the quasilinear nature of the stiffness forces higher topologies for solutions, while the nonlocal inertia requires the consideration of Kelvin-Voigt type damping to close estimates. Finally, a modal approach is used to produce mathematically-oriented numerical simulations that provide insight to the features and limitations of the inextensible model. 
    more » « less