Search for: All records

Abstract Structural information of protein–protein interactions is essential for characterization of life processes at the molecular level. While a small fraction of known protein interactions has experimentally determined structures, computational modeling of protein complexes (protein docking) has to fill the gap. TheDockgroundresource (http://dockground.compbio.ku.edu) provides a collection of datasets for the development and testing of protein docking techniques. Currently,Dockgroundcontains datasets for the bound and the unbound (experimentally determined and simulated) protein structures, model–model complexes, docking decoys of experimentally determined and modeled proteins, and templates for comparative docking. TheDockgroundbound proteins dataset is a core set, from which otherDockgrounddatasets are generated. It is devised as a relational PostgreSQL database containing information on experimentally determined protein–protein complexes. This report on theDockgroundresource describes current status of the datasets, new automated update procedures and further development of the core datasets. We also present a newDockgroundinteractive web interface, which allows search by various parameters, such as release date, multimeric state, complex type, structure resolution, and so on, visualization of the search results with a number of customizable parameters, as well as downloadable datasets with predefined levels of sequence and structure redundancy. 

Abstract Structures of proteins and protein–protein complexes are determined by the same physical principles and thus share a number of similarities. At the same time, there could be differences because in order to function, proteins interact with other molecules, undergo conformations changes, and so forth, which might impose different restraints on the tertiary versus quaternary structures. This study focuses on structural properties of protein–protein interfaces in comparison with the protein core, based on the wealth of currently available structural data and new structure‐based approaches. The results showed that physicochemical characteristics, such as amino acid composition, residue–residue contact preferences, and hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity distributions, are similar in protein core and protein–protein interfaces. On the other hand, characteristics that reflect the evolutionary pressure, such as structural composition and packing, are largely different. The results provide important insight into fundamental properties of protein structure and function. At the same time, the results contribute to better understanding of the ways to dock proteins. Recent progress in predicting structures of individual proteins follows the advancement of deep learning techniques and new approaches to residue coevolution data. Protein core could potentially provide large amounts of data for application of the deep learning to docking. However, our results showed that the core motifs are significantly different from those at protein–protein interfaces, and thus may not be directly useful for docking. At the same time, such difference may help to overcome a major obstacle in application of the coevolutionary data to docking—discrimination of the intramolecular information not directly relevant to docking. 

Abstract Protein docking is essential for structural characterization of protein interactions. Besides providing the structure of protein complexes, modeling of proteins and their complexes is important for understanding the fundamental principles and specific aspects of protein interactions. The accuracy of protein modeling, in general, is still less than that of the experimental approaches. Thus, it is important to investigate the applicability of docking techniques to modeled proteins. We present new comprehensive benchmark sets of protein models for the development and validation of protein docking, as well as a systematic assessment of free and template‐based docking techniques on these sets. As opposed to previous studies, the benchmark sets reflect the real case modeling/docking scenario where the accuracy of the models is assessed by the modeling procedure, without reference to the native structure (which would be unknown in practical applications). We also expanded the analysis to include docking of protein pairs where proteins have different structural accuracy. The results show that, in general, the template‐based docking is less sensitive to the structural inaccuracies of the models than the free docking. The near‐native docking poses generated by the template‐based approach, typically, also have higher ranks than those produces by the free docking (although the free docking is indispensable in modeling the multiplicity of protein interactions in a crowded cellular environment). The results show that docking techniques are applicable to protein models in a broad range of modeling accuracy. The study provides clear guidelines for practical applications of docking to protein models. 

Abstract Comparative docking is based on experimentally determined structures of protein‐protein complexes (templates), following the paradigm that proteins with similar sequences and/or structures form similar complexes. Modeling utilizing structure similarity of target monomers to template complexes significantly expands structural coverage of the interactome. Template‐based docking by structure alignment can be performed for the entire structures or by aligning targets to the bound interfaces of the experimentally determined complexes. Systematic benchmarking of docking protocols based on full and interface structure alignment showed that both protocols perform similarly, with top 1 docking success rate 26%. However, in terms of the models' quality, the interface‐based docking performed marginally better. The interface‐based docking is preferable when one would suspect a significant conformational change in the full protein structure upon binding, for example, a rearrangement of the domains in multidomain proteins. Importantly, if the same structure is selected as the top template by both full and interface alignment, the docking success rate increases 2‐fold for both top 1 and top 10 predictions. Matching structural annotations of the target and template proteins for template detection, as a computationally less expensive alternative to structural alignment, did not improve the docking performance. Sophisticated remote sequence homology detection added templates to the pool of those identified by structure‐based alignment, suggesting that for practical docking, the combination of the structure alignment protocols and the remote sequence homology detection may be useful in order to avoid potential flaws in generation of the structural templates library. 

Association of proteins to a significant extent is determined by their geometric complementarity. Large-scale recognition factors, which directly relate to the funnel-like intermolecular energy landscape, provide important insights into the basic rules of protein recognition. Previously, we showed that simple energy functions and coarse-grained models reveal major characteristics of the energy landscape. As new computational approaches increasingly address structural modeling of a whole cell at the molecular level, it becomes important to account for the crowded environment inside the cell. The crowded environment drastically changes protein recognition properties, and thus significantly alters the underlying energy landscape. In this study, we addressed the effect of crowding on the protein binding funnel, focusing on the size of the funnel. As crowders occupy the funnel volume, they make it less accessible to the ligands. Thus, the funnel size, which can be defined by ligand occupancy, is generally reduced with the increase of the crowders concentration. This study quantifies this reduction for different concentration of crowders and correlates this dependence with the structural details of the interacting proteins. The results provide a better understanding of the rules of protein association in the crowded environment. 

Computational methodologies are increasingly addressing modeling of the whole cell at the molecular level. Proteins and their interactions are the key component of cellular processes. Techniques for modeling protein interactions, thus far, have included protein docking and molecular simulation. The latter approaches account for the dynamics of the interactions but are relatively slow, if carried out at all-atom resolution, or are significantly coarse grained. Protein docking algorithms are far more efficient in sampling spatial coordinates. However, they do not account for the kinetics of the association (i.e., they do not involve the time coordinate). Our proof-of-concept study bridges the two modeling approaches, developing an approach that can reach unprecedented simulation timescales at all-atom resolution. The global intermolecular energy landscape of a large system of proteins was mapped by the pairwise fast Fourier transform docking and sampled in space and time by Monte Carlo simulations. The simulation protocol was parametrized on existing data and validated on a number of observations from experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. The simulation protocol performed consistently across very different systems of proteins at different protein concentrations. It recapitulated data on the previously observed protein diffusion rates and aggregation. The speed of calculation allows reaching second-long trajectories of protein systems that approach the size of the cells, at atomic resolution. 

Membrane proteins are significantly underrepresented in Protein Data Bank despite their essential role in cellular mechanisms and the major progress in experimental protein structure determination. Thus, computational approaches are especially valuable in the case of membrane proteins and their assemblies. The main focus in developing structure prediction techniques has been on soluble proteins, in part due to much greater availability of the structural data. Currently, structure prediction of protein complexes (protein docking) is a well-developed field of study. However, the generic protein docking approaches are not optimal for the membrane proteins because of the differences in physicochemical environment and the spatial constraints imposed by the membranes. Thus, docking of the membrane proteins requires specialized computational methods. Development and benchmarking of the membrane protein docking approaches has to be based on high-quality sets of membrane protein complexes. In this study we present a new dataset of 456 non-redundant alpha helical binary interfaces. The set is significantly larger and more representative than the previously developed sets. In the future, it will become the basis for the development of docking and scoring benchmarks, similar to the ones for soluble proteins in the Dockground resource http://dockground.compbio.ku.edu .