Search for: All records

Neon color spreading (NCS) is an illusory color phenomenon that provides a dramatic example of surface completion and filling-in. Numerous studies have varied both spatial and temporal aspects of the neon- generating stimulus to explore variations in the strength of the effect. Here, we take a novel, parametric, low- level psychophysical approach to studying NCS in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we test the ability of both cone-isolating and equiluminant stimuli to generate neon color spreading for both increments and decre- ments in cone modulations. As expected, sensitivity was low to S(hort-wavelength) cone stimuli due to their poor spatial resolution, but sensitivity was similar for the other color directions. We show that when these differences in detection sensitivity are accounted for, the particular cone type, and the polarity (increment or decrement), make little difference in generating neon color spreading, with NCS visible at about twice detection threshold level in all cases. In Experiment 2, we use L-cone flicker modulations (reddish and greenish excursions around grey) to study sensitivity to NCS as a function of temporal frequency from 0.5 to 8 Hz. After accounting for detectability, the temporal contrast sensitivity functions for NCS are approximately constant or even increase over the studied frequency range. Therefore there is no evidence in this study that the processes underlying NCS are slower than the low-level processes of simple flicker detection. These results point to relatively fast mech- anisms, not slow diffusion processes, as the substrate for NCS. 

A basic problem in psychophysics is to relate the internal representation of a stimulus to its physical intensity. In this study, we measured perceptual scales for achromatic contrast with Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling (MLDS), using squares against a mid-grey background. Observers compared two stimulus pairs and chose the more different pair. All four squares were either achromatic increments (A+), or achromatic decrements (A-). The MLDS result was then compared with 2AFC achromatic pedestal discrimination, with pedestals and tests that were all combinations of A+ and A-. The main result is not novel: A+ and A- obey different rules. A Naka-Rushton saturating function describes the A+ MLDS result well, and the derivative of that function is proportional to the A+ pedestal discrimination for some (but not all) observers. A- MLDS and discrimination results are more complicated and are reminiscent of the classic findings of Whittle (1986, 1992). The sensitivity of A- is a cubic polynomial function of pedestal contrast. These findings will be compared with a similar study of S-cone contrast (reported at VSS 2022), which found a different type of asymmetry between S+ and S-. Presumably these increment/decrement asymmetries are due to underlying differences between ON and OFF neural pathways. One implication is that using stimuli that include both contrast signs, such as gratings and flicker, may obscure important asymmetries in the processing of contrast. 

The desensitization of the visual system as a function of the increasing luminance of a background field yields threshold vs. intensity (tvi) curves, classically measured using increment tests. Here we use a new, high-brightness display system to measure both increment and decrement thresholds. Our display system is based upon a PROPixx three-chip DLP LED color projector (VPixx Technologies, Saint- Bruno, Canada), with light from the projector collected into a field lens and focused onto a high gain rear projection screen. This display combines the brightness of traditional optical systems with the flexibility of control provided by modern displays; in particular, it is simple to use the silent substitution method to isolate single cone types. Here we report tvi curves for achromatic and (L-)ong wavelength sensitive cone isolating tests, measured using method of adjustment. Selected thresholds were verified with a spatial, two-alternative forced-choice procedure. The adapting background was white, with luminances ranging from 0.6 to 4.0 log Trolands (a maximum near 3200 cd/m2, bleaching about 1/3 of the L and M cone pigment). Our observers are slightly more sensitive to decrements than increments (about 0.1 log units), for both achromatic and L-cone tests, and to L-cone tests than to achromatic tests (about 0.6 log cone contrast units), over the entire adapting range. Both increment and decrement thresholds follow the Stiles template, approximating Weber’s law except at the lowest adapting levels. The achromatic tvi’s, for both increment and decrement tests, are, on average, slightly steeper than the L-cone tvi’s. In addition, decrement tvi’s are steeper than the increment tvi’s, indicating greater effects of light adaptation for the decrements, which may be due to differences in the effects of light adaptation in ON and OFF pathways.