Search for: All records

Abstract Submesoscale eddies form an important component of the circulation of the Southern California Bight (SCB). Despite their acknowledged significance in influencing ocean physics, biology, and ecological processes, submesoscale eddies have been exceptionally hard to study and observe because of the technical challenges posed by both field and remote platforms. Here, using a decade of high‐frequency radar surface current observations, we describe submesoscale eddies in the SCB. Between 2012 and 2021, a total of ∼235,000 eddies were detected, averaging 452 ± 116 eddies per week. Recurring eddies in certain locations over time, formed hotspots of eddy activity, largely in association with topographical features. On seasonal scales, eddies were more numerous in the summer and early fall. At inter‐annual scales, eddy counts increased by 40% in association with the 2014–2015 marine heatwave and the 2015–2016 El Niño. A domain‐wide diurnal cycle was observed in the formation of eddies and the normalized vorticity. To determine the relative contributions of tides and diurnal winds, an analysis of spectral components and their spatial distribution along the SCB was conducted. The results revealed that while diurnal tides may exert some influence on the diurnal variations, their effect is comparatively minor when compared to diurnal winds. This conclusion was reached by considering the prevalence of theS₁frequency, which is a meteorological tide known to be associated with motions induced by sea‐land breeze. Overall, diurnal variability was more prominent in the southern SCB and less significant toward the north. 

Abstract Understanding variations in the received power levels for land‐based high frequency radar (HFR) systems is critical to advancing radar‐based estimates of winds and waves. We use a long‐term record of one‐way HFR power observations to explore the key factors controlling propagation losses over the ocean. Observed propagation loss was quantified using an 8‐month record of radio frequency power from a shore‐based transmitter, received at two locations: an offshore tower and a nearby island. Observations were compared to environmental factors such as wind speed and air temperature as well as models of path loss incorporating smooth and rough surface impedances and varying atmospheric properties. Significant differences in the observations at the two sites existed. One‐way path loss variations at the tower, a wavelength above mean sea level, were closely related to atmospheric forcing, while variations at the distant island site were dominated by wind‐driven surface gravity wave variability. Seasonal variability in ocean conductivity had no significant effect on over‐ocean path losses. Simplistic analytical models of path loss were found to have more skill than either ground wave propagation models or more complex numerical models of field strength in matching the observations, due in part to under‐observation of the atmosphere but also the differences in rough surface impedance between models of ocean waves.