Search for: All records

GPS spoofing attacks are a severe threat to unmanned aerial vehicles. These attacks manipulate the true state of the unmanned aerial vehicles, potentially misleading the system without raising alarms. Several techniques, including machine learning, have been proposed to detect these attacks. Most of the studies applied machine learning models without identifying the best hyperparameters, using feature selection and importance techniques, and ensuring that the used dataset is unbiased and balanced. However, no current studies have discussed the impact of model parameters and dataset characteristics on the performance of machine learning models; therefore, this paper fills this gap by evaluating the impact of hyperparameters, regularization parameters, dataset size, correlated features, and imbalanced datasets on the performance of six most commonly known machine learning techniques. These models are Classification and Regression Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Network, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, and Support Vector Machine. Thirteen features extracted from legitimate and simulated GPS attack signals are used to perform this investigation. The evaluation was performed in terms of four metrics: accuracy, probability of misdetection, probability of false alarm, and probability of detection. The results indicate that hyperparameters, regularization parameters, correlated features, dataset size, and imbalanced datasets adversely affect a machine learning model’s performance. The results also show that the Classification and Regression Decision Tree classifier has an accuracy of 99.99%, a probability of detection of 99.98%, a probability of misdetection of 0.2%, and a probability of false alarm of 1.005%, after removing correlated features and using tuned parameters in a balanced dataset. Random Forest can achieve an accuracy of 99.94%, a probability of detection of 99.6%, a probability of misdetection of 0.4%, and a probability of false alarm of 1.01% in similar conditions. 

In this article, real-time jamming detection against unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is proposed via the integration of a software-defined radio (SDR) with an on-board Raspberry Pi processor. The SDR is utilized for capturing and forwarding the radio frequency signals to a receiver module hosted in the processor. This module extracts signal features characterized by orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) parameters, energy parameters, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) parameters. Upon feature extraction, the aforementioned module exploits a machine learning (ML) classifier for detecting and classifying four jamming types; namely, barrage, single-tone, successive-pulse, and protocol-aware. The resulting configuration yielded in an overall detection rate (DR) of 93% and a false alarm rate (FAR) of 1.1%, which are in proximity to their counterparts obtained during the validation stage of the receiver module. 

In this paper, a machine learning (ML) approach is proposed to detect and classify jamming attacks on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Four attack types are implemented using software-defined radio (SDR); namely, barrage, single-tone, successive-pulse, and protocol-aware jamming. Each type is launched against a drone that uses orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) communication to qualitatively analyze its impacts considering jamming range, complexity, and severity. Then, an SDR is utilized in proximity to the drone and in systematic testing scenarios to record the radiometric parameters before and after each attack is launched. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), energy threshold, and several OFDM parameters are exploited as features and fed to six ML algorithms to explore and enable autonomous jamming detection/classification. The algorithms are quantitatively evaluated with metrics including detection and false alarm rates to evaluate the received signals and facilitate efficient decision-making for improved reception integrity and reliability. The resulting ML approach detects and classifies jamming with an accuracy of 92.2% and a false-alarm rate of 1.35%.