Search for: All records

Abstract Unlike micromechanics failure models that have a well-defined crack path, phase-field fracture models are capable of predicting the crack path in arbitrary geometries and dimensions by utilizing a diffuse representation of cracks. However, such models rely on the calibration of a fracture energy (Gc) and a regularization length-scale (lc) parameter, which do not have a strong micromechanical basis. Here, we construct the equivalent crack-tip cohesive zone laws representing a phase-field fracture model, to elucidate the effects of Gc and lc on the fracture resistance and crack growth mechanics under mode I K-field loading. Our results show that the cohesive zone law scales with increasing Gc while maintaining the same functional form. In contrast, increasing lc broadens the process zone and results in a flattened traction-separation profile with a decreased but sustained peak cohesive traction over longer separation distances. While Gc quantitatively captures the fracture initiation toughness, increasing Gc coupled with decreasing lc contributes to a rising fracture resistance curve and a higher steady-state toughness—both these effects cumulate in an evolving cohesive zone law with crack progression. We discuss the relationship between these phase-field parameters and process zone characteristics in the material. 

Continuum mechanics break down in bending stiffness calculations of mono- and few-layered two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals crystal sheets, because their layered atomistic structures are uniquely characterized by strong in-plane bonding coupled with weak interlayer interactions. Here, we elucidate how the bending rigidities of pristine mono- and few-layered molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ), graphene, and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) are governed by their structural geometry and intra- and inter-layer bonding interactions. Atomic force microscopy experiments on the self-folded conformations of these 2D materials on flat substrates show that the bending rigidity of MoS 2 significantly exceeds those of graphene or hBN of comparable layers, despite its much lower tensile modulus. Even on a per-thickness basis, MoS 2 is found to possess similar bending stiffness to hBN and is much stiffer than graphene. Density functional theory calculations suggest that this high bending rigidity of MoS 2 is due to its large interlayer thickness and strong interlayer shear, which prevail over its weak in-plane bonding.