Search for: All records

Summary Lightning strikes kill hundreds of millions of trees annually, but their role in shaping tree life history and diversity is largely unknown.Here, we use data from a unique lightning location system to show that some individual trees counterintuitively benefit from being struck by lightning.Lightning killed 56% of 93 directly struck trees and caused an average of 41% crown dieback among the survivors. However, among these struck trees, 10 direct strikes caused negligible damage toDipteryx oleiferatrees while killing 78% of their lianas and 2.1 Mg of competitor tree biomass. Nine trees of other long‐lived taxa survived lightning with similar benefits. On average, aD. oleiferatree > 60 cm in diameter is struck by lightning at least five times during its lifetime, conferring these benefits repeatedly. We estimate that the ability to survive lightning increases lifetime fecundity 14‐fold, largely because of reduced competition from lianas and neighboring trees. Moreover, the unusual heights and wide crowns ofD. oleiferaincrease the probability of a direct strike by 49–68% relative to trees of the same diameter with average allometries.These patterns suggest that lightning plays an underappreciated role in tree competition, life history strategies, and species coexistence. 

Recruitment and retention of a diverse scientific workforce depends on a more inclusive culture of science. Textbooks introduce prospective scientists to their chosen field and convey its cultural norms. We use ecology textbook data spanning two decades and document little change in representation of scientists during that time. Despite decades of multifaceted efforts to increase diversity in ecology, 91% of founders/innovators and 76% of working scientists introduced in textbooks were white men, poorly matching the demographics of scientists currently publishing in ecology. Textbook images depicted white men working as scientists, while women and people of color were frequently shown as nonscientists. Moreover, textbooks lack discussion of how science and society shape each other. Pathways to increase retention and sense of belonging for individuals from historically excluded groups include updating textbooks to accurately represent the scientists active in the field, contextualizing historical constraints on participation, and revealing how culture shapes scientific investigations.