Search for: All records

Improving energy efficiency has become necessary to enable sustainable computational science. At the same time, scientific workflows are key in facilitating distributed computing in virtually all domain sciences. As data and computational requirements increase, I/O-intensive workflows have become prevalent. In this work, we evaluate the ability of twopopular energy-aware workflow scheduling algorithms to provide effective schedules for this class of workflow applications, that is, schedules that strike a good compromise between workflow execution time and energy consumption. These two algorithms make decisions based on a widely used power consumption model that simply assumes linear correlation to CPU usage. Previous work has shown this model to be inaccurate, in particular for modeling power consumption of I/O-intensive workflow executions, and has proposed an accurate model. We evaluate the effectiveness of the two aforementioned algorithms based on this accurate model. We find that, when making their decisions, these algorithms can underestimate power consumption by up to 360{\%}, which makes it unclear how well these algorithm would fare in practice. To evaluate the benefit of using the more accurate power consumption model in practice, we propose a simple scheduling algorithm that relies on this model to balance the I/O load across the available compute resources. Experimental results show that this algorithm achieves more desirable compromises between energy consumption and workflow execution time than the two popular algorithms.