Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Animal locomotion is the result of complex and multi-layered interactions between the nervous system, the musculo-skeletal system and the environment. Decoding the underlying mechanisms requires an integrative approach. Comparative experimental biology has allowed researchers to study the underlying components and some of their interactions across diverse animals. These studies have shown that locomotor neural circuits are distributed in the spinal cord, the midbrain and higher brain regions in vertebrates. The spinal cord plays a key role in locomotor control because it contains central pattern generators (CPGs) – systems of coupled neuronal oscillators that provide coordinated rhythmic control of muscle activation that can be viewed as feedforward controllers – and multiple reflex loops that provide feedback mechanisms. These circuits are activated and modulated by descending pathways from the brain. The relative contributions of CPGs, feedback loops and descending modulation, and how these vary between species and locomotor conditions, remain poorly understood. Robots and neuromechanical simulations can complement experimental approaches by testing specific hypotheses and performing what-if scenarios. This Review will give an overview of key knowledge gained from comparative vertebrate experiments, and insights obtained from neuromechanical simulations and robotic approaches. We suggest that the roles of CPGs, feedback loops and descending modulation vary among animals depending on body size, intrinsic mechanical stability, time required to reach locomotor maturity and speed effects. We also hypothesize that distal joints rely more on feedback control compared with proximal joints. Finally, we highlight important opportunities to address fundamental biological questions through continued collaboration between experimentalists and engineers. 

ABSTRACT Recent studies of in vivo muscle function in guinea fowl revealed that distal leg muscles rapidly modulate force and work to stabilize running in uneven terrain. Previous studies focused on running only, and it remains unclear how muscular mechanisms for stability differ between walking and running. Here, we investigated in vivo function of the lateral gastrocnemius (LG) during walking over obstacles. We compared muscle function in birds with intact (iLG) versus self-reinnervated LG (rLG). Self-reinnervation results in proprioceptive feedback deficit due to loss of monosynaptic stretch reflex. We tested the hypothesis that proprioceptive deficit results in decreased modulation of EMG activity in response to obstacle contact, and a delayed obstacle recovery compared with that for iLG. We found that total myoelectric intensity (Etot) of iLG increased by 68% in obstacle strides (S 0) compared with level terrain, suggesting a substantial reflex-mediated response. In contrast, Etot of rLG increased by 31% in S 0 strides compared with level walking, but also increased by 43% in the first post-obstacle (S +1) stride. In iLG, muscle force and work differed significantly from level walking only in the S 0 stride, indicating a single-stride recovery. In rLG, force increased in S 0, S +1 and S +2 compared with level walking, indicating three-stride obstacle recovery. Interestingly, rLG showed little variation in work output and shortening velocity in obstacle terrain, indicating a shift towards near-isometric strut-like function. Reinnervated birds also adopted a more crouched posture across level and obstacle terrains compared with intact birds. These findings suggest gait-specific control mechanisms in walking and running. 

Abstract Navigating complex terrains requires dynamic interactions between the substrate, musculoskeletal, and sensorimotor systems. Current perturbation studies have mostly used visible terrain height perturbations, which do not allow us to distinguish among the neuromechanical contributions of feedforward control, feedback-mediated, and mechanical perturbation responses. Here, we use treadmill-belt speed perturbations to induce a targeted perturbation to foot speed only, and without terrain-induced changes in joint posture and leg loading at stance onset. Based on previous studies suggesting a proximo-distal gradient in neuromechanical control, we hypothesized that distal joints would exhibit larger changes in joint kinematics, compared to proximal joints. Additionally, we expected birds to use feedforward strategies to increase the intrinsic stability of gait. To test these hypotheses, seven adult guinea fowl were video recorded while walking on a motorized treadmill, during both steady and perturbed trials. Perturbations consisted of repeated exposures to a deceleration and acceleration of the treadmill-belt speed. Surprisingly, we found that joint angular trajectories and center of mass fluctuations remain very similar, despite substantial perturbation of foot velocity by the treadmill belt. Hip joint angular trajectories exhibit the largest changes, with the birds adopting a slightly more flexed position across all perturbed strides. Additionally, we observed increased stride duration across all strides, consistent with feedforward changes in the control strategy. The speed perturbations mainly influenced the timing of stance and swing, with the largest kinematic changes in the strides directly following a deceleration. Our findings do not support the general hypothesis of a proximo-distal gradient in joint control, as distal joint kinematics remain largely unchanged. Instead, we find that leg angular trajectory and the timing of stance and swing are most sensitive to this specific perturbation, and leg length actuation remains largely unchanged. Our results are consistent with modular task-level control of leg length and leg angle actuation, with different neuromechanical control and perturbation sensitivity in each actuation mode. Distal joints appear to be sensitive to changes in vertical loading but not foot fore-aft velocity. Future directions should include in vivo studies of muscle activation and force–length dynamics to provide more direct evidence of the sensorimotor control strategies for stability in response to belt-speed perturbations. 

ABSTRACT The work loop technique has provided key insights into in vivo muscle work and power during steady locomotion. However, for many animals and muscles, ex vivo experiments are not feasible. In addition, purely sinusoidal strain trajectories lack variations in strain rate that result from variable loading during locomotion. Therefore, it is useful to develop an ‘avatar’ approach in which in vivo strain and activation patterns from one muscle are replicated in ex vivo experiments on a readily available muscle from an established animal model. In the present study, we used mouse extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles in ex vivo experiments to investigate in vivo mechanics of the guinea fowl lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscle during unsteady running on a treadmill with obstacle perturbations. In vivo strain trajectories from strides down from obstacle to treadmill, up from treadmill to obstacle, strides with no obstacle and sinusoidal strain trajectories at the same amplitude and frequency were used as inputs in work loop experiments. As expected, EDL forces produced with in vivo strain trajectories were more similar to in vivo LG forces (R2=0.58–0.94) than were forces produced with the sinusoidal trajectory (average R2=0.045). Given the same stimulation, in vivo strain trajectories produced work loops that showed a shift in function from more positive work during strides up from treadmill to obstacle to less positive work in strides down from obstacle to treadmill. Stimulation, strain trajectory and their interaction had significant effects on all work loop variables, with the interaction having the largest effect on peak force and work per cycle. These results support the theory that muscle is an active material whose viscoelastic properties are tuned by activation, and which produces forces in response to deformations of length associated with time-varying loads.