Search for: All records

Abstract This study investigates the evolution of substorm onset beads into poleward expansion, surge, and streamer formation during the substorm expansion phase. Using optical observations, we infer the transition from near‐Earth instability to the formation of a near‐Earth neutral line (NENL). We found that a thin, faint arc appeared immediately poleward of the onset arc shortly after substorm onset but prior to significant poleward expansion. Beads within the longitudinal extent of this poleward arc expanded poleward more rapidly than those outside this region. The western edge of the poleward‐expanding beads formed the surge, and streamers emanated from the poleward‐expanding arc. Poleward expansion occurred stepwise, with each step associated with a re‐intensification of the poleward arc. Analysis of an event with simultaneous observations from the Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) satellite and THEMIS all‐sky imager showed a near‐simultaneous occurrence of stepwise poleward expansion and dipolarization fronts. The lack of a significant time delay suggests that an X‐line initiates in the near‐Earth plasma sheet at approximately 11.8 R_Eafter onset. This stepwise poleward expansion suggests a corresponding stepwise tailward retreat of the X‐line toward NENL locations observed further tailward in earlier studies. 

Abstract The space hurricane is a polar cap auroral structure with strong flow shears and intense particle precipitation that can disturb the thermosphere under quiet geomagnetic conditions. Here the statistical characteristics of this interaction are surveyed using data from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program and Gravity Field and Steady‐State Ocean Circulation Explorer satellites. The results confirm that space hurricanes modify the ion and neutral circulation in the polar cap through enhanced electric fields. Local precipitation, particularly >500 eV electrons, which raises the Pedersen conductance, leads to enhanced Joule heating and the generation of gravity waves. Electric fields play a leading role on the dawn side of the space hurricane. Gravity waves are also mainly located on the dawnside of the space hurricane, with a maximum vertical wind of 37 m/s and a 17% neutral density disturbance. These findings augment our awareness of magnetosphere‐polar ionosphere‐thermosphere coupling under quiet northward IMF conditions. 

Abstract Enhancement of currents in Earth's ionosphere adversely impacts systems and technologies, and one example of extreme enhancement is supersubstorms. Despite the name, whether a supersubstorm is a substorm remains an open question, because studies suggest that unlike substorms, supersubstorms sometimes affect all local times including the dayside. The spectacular May 2024 storm contains signatures of two supersubstorms that occurred successively in time with similar magnitude and duration, and we explore the nature of them by examining the morphology of the auroral electrojet, the corresponding disturbances in the magnetosphere, and the solar wind driving conditions. The results show that the two events exhibit distinctly different features. The first event was characterized by a locally intensified electrojet followed by a rapid expansion in latitude and local time. Auroral observations showed poleward expansion of auroras (or aurorae), and geosynchronous observations showed thickening of the plasma sheet, magnetic field dipolarization, and energetic particle injections. The second event was characterized by an instantaneous intensification of the electrojet over broad latitude and local time. Auroras did not expand but brightened simultaneously across the sky. Radar and LEO observations showed enhancement of the ionospheric electric field. Therefore, the first event is a substorm, whereas the second event is enhancement of general magnetospheric convection driven by a solar wind pressure increase. These results illustrate that the so‐called supersubstorms have more than one type of driver, and that internal instability in the magnetotail and external driving of the solar wind are equally important in driving extreme auroral electrojet activity. 

Abstract We present multi‐platform observations of plasma cloak, O+ outflows, kinetic Alfven waves (KAWs), and auroral oval for the geomagnetic storm on 17 March 2015. During the storm's main phase, we observed a generally symmetric equatorward motion of the auroral oval in both hemispheres, corresponding to the plasmasphere erosion and inward motion of the plasma sheet. Consequently, Van Allen Probes became immersed within the plasma sheet for extended hours and repeatedly observed correlated KAWs and O+ outflows. The KAWs contain adequate energy flux toward the ionosphere to energize the observed outflow ions. Adiabatic particle tracing suggests that the O+ outflows are directly from the nightside auroral oval and that the energization is through a quasi‐static potential drop. The O+ outflows from the nightside auroral oval were adequate (‐ #/‐s) and prompt (several minutes) to explain the newly formed plasma cloak, suggesting that they were a dominant initial source of plasma cloak during this storm. 

Abstract Following the auroral substorm onset, the active aurora undergoes expansion, which can vary in spatial and temporal extent. The spatiotemporal development of the expansion phase active aurora is controlled by new auroral intensifications that often follow the initial onset. Using seven examples, we investigate the nature of these new auroral intensifications and address a question: are they new auroral onsets, that is, “successive onsets” or poleward‐boundary intensifications (PBIs) and ensuing auroral streamers? We observed events that included both types of auroral features—successive onsets and PBIs—and their combinations. For multiple‐onset substorms, successive onsets may occur eastward, westward, and poleward of the initial onset, resulting in a diverse range of expansion phase spatial extent and durations. Single‐onset substorms show only one auroral onset, but their spatiotemporal development can resemble that of multiple‐onset substorms. However, the additional activations are mainly PBIs and subsequent streamers. In some cases, PBIs undergo explosion, leading to a rapid poleward and azimuthal expansion of the aurora, resembling the auroral substorm onset. A prolonged sequence of PBIs and its longitudinal extension can contribute significantly to the spatiotemporal development of substorms expansion phase. Results suggest that post‐onset flow channels drive the spatiotemporal development of the substorm expansion phase by (a) triggering successive onsets and (b) inducing bursts of PBIs and their prolonged sequence. We speculate that post‐onset flow channels likely originate from the polar cap, but more evaluation is required. Our findings highlight the significance of examining imager data before solely relying on magnetometers to identify substorm onsets. 

Abstract Geomagnetic storms transfer massive amounts of energy from the sun to geospace. Some of that energy is dissipated in the ionosphere as energetic particles precipitate and transfer their energy to the atmosphere, creating the aurora. We used the Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) mosaic of all‐sky‐imagers across Canada and Alaska to measure the amount of energy flux deposited into the ionosphere via auroral precipitation during the 2013 March 17 storm. We determined the time‐dependent percent of the total energy flux that is contributed by meso‐scale (<500 km wide) auroral features, discovering they contribute up to 80% during the sudden storm commencement (SSC) and >∼40% throughout the main phase, indicating meso‐scale dynamics are important aspects of a geomagnetic storm. We found that average conductance was higher north of 65° until SYM‐H reached −40 nT. We also found that the median conductance was higher in the post‐midnight sector during the SSC, though localized conductance peaks (sometimes >75 mho) were much higher in the pre‐midnight sector throughout. We related the post‐midnight/pre‐dawn conductance to other recent findings regarding meso‐scale dynamics in the literature. We found sharp conductance peaks and gradients in both time and space related to meso‐scale aurora. Data processing included a new moonlight removal algorithm and cross‐instrument calibration with a meridian scanning photometer and a standard photometer. We compared ASI results to Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar (PFISR) observations, finding energy flux, mean energy, and Hall conductance were highly correlated, moderately correlated, and highly correlated, respectively. 

Abstract The space hurricane is a three‐dimensional magnetic vortex structure with strong flow shears and electron precipitation in the polar cap. This study investigates for the first time how a space hurricane disturbs the polar thermosphere. During the formation and development of the space hurricane, the directional reversal of the horizontal neutral wind and the plasma convection will both be relocated from the poleward auroral oval boundary to the edge of the space hurricane, but the neutral wind responds slower compared to the plasma convection. Strong flow shears in the space hurricane causes enhanced Joule heating in the polar cap, which heats the thermosphere and triggers Atmospheric Gravity Waves (AGWs). Statistical results reveal that significant AGWs mainly are located on the dawnside of the space hurricane, suggesting that the space hurricane plays a significant role in ion‐neutral coupling and generation of polar cap AGWs. 

Abstract Extreme (>20 nT/s) geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs, also denoted as MPEs—magnetic perturbation events)—impulsive nighttime disturbances with time scale ∼5–10 min, have sufficient amplitude to cause bursts of geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) that can damage technical infrastructure. In this study, we present occurrence statistics for extreme GMD events from five stations in the MACCS and AUTUMNX magnetometer arrays in Arctic Canada at magnetic latitudes ranging from 65° to 75°. We report all large (≥6 nT/s) and extreme GMDs from these stations from 2011 through 2022 to analyze variations of GMD activity over a full solar cycle and compare them to those found in three earlier studies. GMD activity between 2011 and 2022 did not closely follow the sunspot cycle, but instead was lowest during its rising phase and maximum (2011–2014) and highest during the early declining phase (2015–2017). Most of these GMDs, especially the most extreme, were associated with high‐speed solar wind streams (Vsw >600 km/s) and steady solar wind pressure. All extreme GMDs occurred within 80 min after substorm onsets, but few within 5 min. Multistation data often revealed a poleward progression of GMDs, consistent with a tailward retreat of the magnetotail reconnection region. These observations indicate that extreme GIC hazard conditions can occur for a variety of solar wind drivers and geomagnetic conditions, not only for fast‐coronal mass ejection driven storms. 

Abstract The Poynting vector (Poynting flux) from Earth's magnetosphere downward toward its ionosphere carries the energy that powers the Joule heating in the ionosphere and thermosphere. The Joule heating controls fundamental ionospheric properties affecting the entire magnetosphere‐ionosphere‐thermosphere system, so it is necessary to understand when and where the Poynting flux is significant. Taking advantage of new data sets generated from DMSP (Defense Meteorological Satellite Program) observations, we investigate the Poynting flux distribution within and around the auroral zone, where most magnetosphere‐ionosphere (M‐I) dynamics and thus Joule heating occurs. We find that the Poynting flux, which is generally larger under more active conditions, is concentrated in the sunlit cusp and near the interface between Region 1 and 2 currents. The former concentration suggests voltage generators drive the cusp dynamics. The latter concentration shows asymmetries with respect to the interface between the Region 1 and 2 currents. We show that these reflect the controlling impact of subauroral polarization streams and dawnside auroral polarization streams on the Poynting flux. 

Abstract A new observational phenomenon, named Simultaneous Global Ionospheric Density Disturbance (SGD), is identified in GNSS total electron content (TEC) data during periods of three typical geospace disturbances: a Coronal Mass Ejection‐driven severe disturbance event, a high‐speed stream event, and a minor disturbance day with a maximum Kp of 4. SGDs occur frequently on dayside and dawn sectors, with a ∼1% TEC increase. Notably, SGDs can occur under minor solar‐geomagnetic disturbances. SGDs are likely caused by penetration electric fields (PEFs) of solar‐geomagnetic origin, as they are associated with Bz southward, increased auroral AL/AU, and solar wind pressure enhancements. These findings offer new insights into the nature of PEFs and their ionospheric impact while confirming some key earlier results obtained through alternative methods. Importantly, the accessibility of extensive GNSS networks, with at least 6,000 globally distributed receivers for ionospheric research, means that rich PEF information can be acquired, offering researchers numerous opportunities to investigate geospace electrodynamics.