Search for: All records

Abstract Climate communication scientists search for effective message strategies to engage the ambivalent public in support of climate advocacy. The personal experience of wildfire is expected to render climate change impacts more concretely, pointing to a potential message strategy to engage the public. This study examined Twitter discourse related to climate change during the onset of 20 wildfires in California between the years 2017 and 2021. In this mixed method study, we analyzed tweets geographically and temporally proximal to the occurrence of wildfires to discover framings and examined how frequencies in climate framings changed before and after fires. Results identified three predominant climate framings: linking wildfire to climate change, suggesting climate actions, and attributing climate change to adversities besides wildfires. Mean tweet frequencies linking wildfire to climate change and attributing adversities increased significantly after the onset of fire. While suggesting climate action tweets also increased, the increase was not statistically significant. Temporal analysis of tweet frequencies for the three themes of tweets showed that discussion increased after the onset of a fire but persisted typically no more than 2 weeks. For fires that burned for longer periods of more than a month, external events triggered climate discussions. Our findings contribute to identifying how the personal experience of wildfire shapes Twitter discussion related to climate change, and how these framings change over time during wildfire events, leading to insights into critical time points after wildfire for implementing message strategies to increase public engagement on climate change impacts and policy. 

Dataflow systems have an increasing need to support a wide range of tasks in data-centric applications using latest techniques such as machine learning. These tasks often involve custom functions with complex internal states. Consequently, users need enhanced debugging support to understand runtime behaviors and investigate internal states of dataflows. Traditional forward debuggers allow users to follow the chronological order of operations in an execution. Therefore, a user cannot easily identify a past runtime behavior after an unexpected result is produced. In this paper, we present a novel time-travel debugging paradigm called IcedTea, which supports reverse debugging. In particular, in a dataflow's execution, which is inherently distributed across multiple operators, the user can periodically interact with the job and retrieve the global states of the operators. After the execution, the system allows the user to roll back the dataflow state to any past interactions. The user can use step instructions to repeat the past execution to understand how data was processed in the original execution. We give a full specification of this powerful paradigm, study how to reduce its runtime overhead and develop techniques to support debugging instructions responsively. Our experiments on real-world datasets and workflows show that IcedTea can support responsive time-travel debugging with low time and space overhead. 

Foundation Models (FMs) are gaining increasing attention in the biomedical artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem due to their ability to represent and contextualize multimodal biomedical data. These capabilities make FMs a valuable tool for a variety of tasks, including biomedical reasoning, hypothesis generation, and interpreting complex imaging data. In this review paper, we address the unique challenges associated with establishing an ethical and trustworthy biomedical AI ecosystem, with a particular focus on the development of FMs and their downstream applications. We explore strategies that can be implemented throughout the biomedical AI pipeline to effectively tackle these challenges, ensuring that these FMs are translated responsibly into clinical and translational settings. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of key stewardship and co-design principles that not only ensure robust regulation but also guarantee that the interests of all stakeholders—especially those involved in or affected by these clinical and translational applications—are adequately represented. We aim to empower the biomedical AI community to harness these models responsibly and effectively. As we navigate this exciting frontier, our collective commitment to ethical stewardship, co-design, and responsible translation will be instrumental in ensuring that the evolution of FMs truly enhances patient care and medical decision-making, ultimately leading to a more equitable and trustworthy biomedical AI ecosystem.