Search for: All records

Abstract Climate change is exposing coastal landscapes to more flooding, in addition to rapidly rising temperatures. These changes are critical in the Arctic where the effects of sea level rise are exacerbated by the loss of sea ice protecting coasts, subsidence as permafrost thaws, and a projected increase in storms. Such changes will likely alter the land-atmosphere gas exchange of high-latitude coastal ecosystems, but the effects of flooding with warming remain unexplored. In this work we use a field experiment to examine the interacting effects of increased tidal flooding and warming on land-atmosphere CO₂and CH₄exchange in the coastal Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta, a large sub-Arctic wetland and tundra complex in western Alaska. We inundated dammed plots to simulate two levels of future flooding: low-intensity flooding represented by one day of flooding per summer-month (June, July and August), and high-intensity flooding represented by three-consecutive days of flooding per summer-month, crossed with a warming treatment of 1.4 °C. We found that both flooding and warming influenced greenhouse gas (GHG) exchange. Low-intensity flooding reduced net CO₂uptake by 20% (0.78µmol m⁻²s⁻¹) regardless of temperature, and marginally increased CH₄emissions 0.83 nmol m⁻²s⁻¹(33%) under ambient temperature, while decreasing CH₄emissions by −1.96 nmol m⁻²s⁻¹(40%) under warming. In contrast, high-intensity flooding restored net CO₂uptake to control levels due to enhanced primary productivity under both temperature treatments. High-intensity flooding decreased CH₄emissions under ambient temperature by 0.76 nmol m⁻²s⁻¹(30%), but greatly increased emissions under warming by 4.68 nmol m⁻²s⁻¹(265%), presumably driven by increased plant-mediated CH₄transport. These findings reveal that GHG exchange responds rapidly and non-linearly to intensifying flooding, and highlight the importance of short-term flooding dynamics and warming in shaping future carbon cycling in this Arctic coastal wetland. 

Abstract Sea level rise and more frequent and larger storms will increase saltwater flooding in coastal terrestrial ecosystems, altering soil‐atmosphere CO₂and CH₄exchange. Understanding these impacts is particularly relevant in high‐latitude coastal soils that hold large carbon stocks but where the interaction of salinity and moisture on greenhouse gas flux remains unexplored. Here, we quantified the effects of salinity and moisture on CO₂and CH₄fluxes from low‐Arctic coastal soils from three landscape positions (two Wetlands and Upland Tundra) distinguished by elevation, flooding frequency, soil characteristics, and vegetation. We used a full factorial laboratory incubation experiment of three soil moisture levels (40%, 70%, or 100% saturation) and four salinity levels (freshwater, 3, 6, or 12 ppt). Salinity and soil moisture were important controls on CO₂and CH₄emissions across all landscape positions. In saturated soil, CO₂emissions increased with salinity in the lower elevation landscape positions but not in the Upland Tundra soil. Saturated soil was necessary for large CH₄emissions. CH₄emissions were greatest with low salinity, or after 11 weeks of incubation when SO₄²⁻was exhausted allowing for methanogenesis as the dominant mechanism of anaerobic respiration. In partially saturated soil, greater salinity suppressed CO₂production in all soils. CH₄fluxes were overall quite low, but increased between 3 and 6 ppt in the Tundra. In the future, a small increase in floodwater salinity may increase CO₂production while suppressing CH₄production; however, where water is impounded, CH₄production could become large, particularly in the landscapes most likely to flood. 

Abstract Environmental changes, such as climate warming and higher herbivory pressure, are altering the carbon balance of Arctic ecosystems; yet, how these drivers modify the carbon balance among different habitats remains uncertain. This hampers our ability to predict changes in the carbon sink strength of tundra ecosystems. We investigated how spring goose grubbing and summer warming—two key environmental‐change drivers in the Arctic—alter CO₂fluxes in three tundra habitats varying in soil moisture and plant‐community composition. In a full‐factorial experiment in high‐Arctic Svalbard, we simulated grubbing and warming over two years and determined summer net ecosystem exchange (NEE) alongside its components: gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) and ecosystem respiration (ER). After two years, we found net CO₂uptake to be suppressed by both drivers depending on habitat. CO₂uptake was reduced by warming in mesic habitats, by warming and grubbing in moist habitats, and by grubbing in wet habitats. In mesic habitats, warming stimulated ER (+75%) more than GEP (+30%), leading to a 7.5‐fold increase in their CO₂source strength. In moist habitats, grubbing decreased GEP and ER by ~55%, while warming increased them by ~35%, with no changes in summer‐long NEE. Nevertheless, grubbing offset peak summer CO₂uptake and warming led to a twofold increase in late summer CO₂source strength. In wet habitats, grubbing reduced GEP (−40%) more than ER (−30%), weakening their CO₂sink strength by 70%. One‐year CO₂‐flux responses were similar to two‐year responses, and the effect of simulated grubbing was consistent with that of natural grubbing. CO₂‐flux rates were positively related to aboveground net primary productivity and temperature. Net ecosystem CO₂uptake started occurring above ~70% soil moisture content, primarily due to a decline in ER. Herein, we reveal that key environmental‐change drivers—goose grubbing by decreasing GEP more than ER and warming by enhancing ER more than GEP—consistently suppress net tundra CO₂uptake, although their relative strength differs among habitats. By identifying how and where grubbing and higher temperatures alter CO₂fluxes across the heterogeneous Arctic landscape, our results have implications for predicting the tundra carbon balance under increasing numbers of geese in a warmer Arctic. 

Abstract With rapid climate warming, some coastal high‐latitude ecosystems are experiencing more frequent tidal floods. Yet little is known about tundra plant‐community responses to flooding, and whether Arctic warming may modulate such responses.In a 2‐year, full‐factorial field experiment in coastal tundra wetlands of the Yukon‐Kuskokwim (Y‐K) Delta (western Alaska), we simulated periodic tidal flood events at two severities under both ambient and warmed summer conditions and measured above‐ground plant‐community responses. Low‐severity flooding represented overbank flooding 1 day per month, which is consistent with projections in the next 5 years. High‐severity flooding represented a more impactful flooding regime (three consecutive days per month) that is projected to occur in the next 10 years. Our warming treatment (+1°C) also represented a change projected in the next 10 years.Regardless of temperature, high‐severity flooding increased graminoid biomass by >45%, in turn increasing live plant‐community biomass by >18%. Low‐severity flooding had similar, though weaker, effects. Flooding had overall negative effects on both forb and shrub biomass, though shrub responses were weaker. Only during the second summer, warming increased graminoid biomass by 20% and tended to increase shrub biomass, regardless of flooding. Concurrently, warming enhanced standing‐dead graminoid biomass by 20%, while high‐severity flooding decreased it by 15%. Therefore, wet tundra that was both flooded and warmed had the greatest proportion of graminoids and total live biomass, but standing‐dead biomass comparable to that of unmanipulated wet tundra.Synthesis. While our manipulations simulated flooding and warming regimes expected in the wetlands of the Y‐K Delta over the same, near‐future (5‐to‐10 years) time frame, flooding had stronger effects than warming. What is striking is the rate at which graminoid increases occurred, becoming apparent after only two monthly flood events in the first experimental year. Flooding‐induced decreases in standing‐dead biomass suggests that the incorporation of dead plant material into the litter layer might be facilitated by tidal floods. These rapid increases in plant biomass and potentially biomass turnover, especially of graminoids, which are characterized by high‐quality litter, may have major implications for carbon and nutrient cycling of more frequently flooded coastal ecosystems in a warmer Arctic. 

Abstract QuestionUnderstanding the sensitivity and magnitude of plant community responses in tundra wetlands to herbivory and warming is pressing as these ecosystems are increasingly threatened by changes in grazing pressure and higher temperatures. Here, we ask to what extent different low‐Arctic coastal wetland plant communities are affected by short‐term goose grazing and warming, and whether these communities differ in their responses. LocationYukon–Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska. MethodsWe conducted an experiment where we simulated goose grazing by clipping the vegetation and summer warming by using open‐top chambers in three plant communities along a 6‐km coastal–inland gradient. We assessed plant community compositional changes following two years of treatments. ResultsGrazing had stronger effects than warming on both plant functional group and species composition. Overall, grazing decreased the abundance of grasses and sedges and increased the abundance of forbs, whereas warming only caused a decrease in forb abundance. However, plant communities and functional groups, both within and across communities, varied widely in their responses to treatments. Grazing decreased grass abundance (−25%) and increased forb abundance (+44%) in the two more coastal communities, and reduced sedge abundance (−22%) only in the most inland community. Warming only decreased forb abundance (−18%) in the most coastal community, which overall was the most responsive to treatments. ConclusionsWe show that short‐term goose grazing predominates over short‐term summer warming in eliciting compositional changes in three different low‐Arctic coastal wetland plant communities. Yet, responses varied among communities and the same functional groups could respond differently across them, highlighting the importance of investigating the effects of biotic and abiotic drivers in different contexts. By showing that tundra wetland plant communities can differ in their immediate sensitivity to goose grazing and, though to a lesser extent, warming, our findings have implications for the functioning of these rapidly changing high‐latitude ecosystems. 

Abstract Given the current rates of climate change, with associated shifts in herbivore population densities, understanding the role of different herbivores in ecosystem functioning is critical for predicting ecosystem responses. Here, we examined how migratory geese and resident, non‐migratory reindeer—two dominating yet functionally contrasting herbivores—control vegetation and ecosystem processes in rapidly warming Arctic tundra.We collected vegetation and ecosystem carbon (C) flux data at peak plant growing season in the two longest running, fully replicated herbivore removal experiments found in high‐Arctic Svalbard. Experiments had been set up independently in wet habitat utilised by barnacle geeseBranta leucopsisin summer and in moist‐to‐dry habitat utilised by wild reindeerRangifer tarandus platyrhynchusyear‐round.Excluding geese induced vegetation state transitions from heavily grazed, moss‐dominated (only 4 g m⁻²of live above‐ground vascular plant biomass) to ungrazed, graminoid‐dominated (60 g m⁻²after 4‐year exclusion) and horsetail‐dominated (150 g m⁻²after 15‐year exclusion) tundra. This caused large increases in vegetation C and nitrogen (N) pools, dead biomass and moss‐layer depth. Alterations in plant N concentration and CN ratio suggest overall slower plant community nutrient dynamics in the short‐term (4‐year) absence of geese. Long‐term (15‐year) goose removal quadrupled net ecosystem C sequestration (NEE) by increasing ecosystem photosynthesis more than ecosystem respiration (ER).Excluding reindeer for 21 years also produced detectable increases in live above‐ground vascular plant biomass (from 50 to 80 g m⁻²; without promoting vegetation state shifts), as well as in vegetation C and N pools, dead biomass, moss‐layer depth and ER. Yet, reindeer removal did not alter the chemistry of plants and soil or NEE.Synthesis. Although both herbivores were key drivers of ecosystem structure and function, the control exerted by geese in their main habitat (wet tundra) was much more pronounced than that exerted by reindeer in their main habitat (moist‐to‐dry tundra). Importantly, these herbivore effects are scale dependent, because geese are more spatially concentrated and thereby affect a smaller portion of the tundra landscape compared to reindeer. Our results highlight the substantial heterogeneity in how herbivores shape tundra vegetation and ecosystem processes, with implications for ongoing environmental change. 

Abstract Environmental changes can rapidly alter standing biomass in tundra plant communities; yet, to what extent can they modify plant‐community nutrient levels? Nutrient levels and their changes can affect biomass production, nutrient cycling rates and nutrient availability to herbivores. We examined how environmental perturbations alter Arctic plant‐community leaf nutrient concentrations (percentage of dry mass, i.e. resource quality) and nutrient pools (absolute mass per unit area, i.e. resource quantity).We experimentally imposed two different types of environmental perturbations in a high‐Arctic ecosystem in Svalbard, spanning three habitats differing in soil moisture and plant‐community composition. We mimicked both a pulse perturbation (a grubbing event by geese in spring) and a press perturbation (a constant level of summer warming).After 2 years of perturbations, we quantified peak‐season nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in 1268 leaf samples from the most abundant vascular plant species. We derived community‐weighted nutrient concentrations and total amount of nutrients (pools) for whole plant communities and individual plant functional types (PFTs).Spring grubbing increased plant‐community nutrient concentrations in mesic (+13%) and wet (+8%), but not moist, habitats, and reduced nutrient pools in all habitats (moist: −49%; wet, mesic: −31% to −37%). Conversely, summer warming reduced plant‐community nutrient concentrations in mesic and moist (−10% to −12%), but not wet, habitats and increased nutrient pools in moist habitats (+50%).Fast‐growing PFTs exhibited nutrient‐concentration responses, while slow‐growing PFTs generally did not. Grubbing enhanced nutrient concentrations of forbs and grasses in wet habitats (+20%) and of horsetails and grasses in mesic habitats (+19–23%). Conversely, warming decreased nutrient concentrations of horsetails in wet habitats (−15%) and of grasses, horsetails and forbs in moist habitats (−12% to −15%). Nutrient pools held by each PFT were less affected, although the most abundant PFTs responded to perturbations.Synthesis. Arctic plant‐community nutrient levels can be rapidly altered by environmental changes, with consequences for short‐term process rates and plant‐herbivore interactions. Community‐level responses in nutrient concentrations and pools were opposing and differed among habitats and PFTs. Our findings have implications for how we understand herbivory‐ and warming‐induced shifts in the fine‐scaled distribution of resource quality and quantity within and across tundra habitats. 

While the Arctic warms rapidly, several coastal tundra regions face increasing threats from altered flooding regimes. Yet, how flooding shapes coastal tundra ecosystems remains largely unknown. We experimentally examined how increased tidal flooding, under both ambient and elevated temperatures, influences key drivers of ecosystem functioning: micro-environment, vegetation, and organic matter decomposition. Data were collected across three summers (2022-2024) in a low-Arctic coastal tundra heath of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (Alaska) – one of the largest high-latitude riverine deltas in North America. In May 2022, soon after snowmelt, we selected seven blocks within the focal tundra heath. Each block contained six plots, for a total of 42 plots. Plots within blocks were randomly assigned to a factorial combination of experimental monthly tidal floods (three levels: no-flooding, low-severity flooding, and high-severity flooding) and experimental warming (two levels: ambient and higher temperatures). We focused on three response categories: (1) micro-environmental changes, including air and soil temperatures, soil active layer thickness, redox potential, salinity, potential of hydrogen (pH), and chemistry; (2) vegetation responses, such as aboveground community composition and biomass, plant height, and root production; and (3) responses of organic matter decomposition (mass loss, decomposition rate, and stabilization factor). 

This dataset was created to understand plant trait responses to warming, flooding, and herbivory in the Yukon-Kuskokwim (Y-K) Delta (western Alaska, USA). We conducted a one-year field mesocosm experiment in which we passively increased temperatures, simulated periodic tidal flooding at two intensity levels (low and high), and applied three components of goose herbivory (grazing, feces addition, and trampling) during the summer growing season. Our treatments reflect changes expected in the Y-K Delta in the next 10-20 years. We conducted the experiment in three community types: a wet sedge-shrub meadow, a tundra, and a transitional wet community between the meadow and tundra, and only sampled the dominant species in these communities. At the end of the season, we harvested height, leaf area, specific leaf area, and leaf dry matter content from randomly selected individuals. 

This dataset was used to answer the question: how do flooding and warming alter carbon dioxide and methane flux from coastal wetlands of the Yukon-Kuskokwim (Y-K) Delta (Western Alaska, USA)? Over two years, we simulated periodic summer tidal flood events at two severity levels and passively increased summer temperatures in a full-factorial field experiment, and the response of gas measured the response of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes. We simulated low-severity and high-severity flooding to represent near-future flooding regimes for the Y-K Delta, projected respectively in the next ~5 and ~10 years. The experiment was established in a wet sedge-shrub meadow, an ecotype covering greater than 10% of the vegetated area of the central coast of the Y-K Delta. We measured gas fluxes approximately twice per week using static chambers during the summer of 2023.