Search for: All records

Abstract QuestionUnderstanding the sensitivity and magnitude of plant community responses in tundra wetlands to herbivory and warming is pressing as these ecosystems are increasingly threatened by changes in grazing pressure and higher temperatures. Here, we ask to what extent different low‐Arctic coastal wetland plant communities are affected by short‐term goose grazing and warming, and whether these communities differ in their responses. LocationYukon–Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska. MethodsWe conducted an experiment where we simulated goose grazing by clipping the vegetation and summer warming by using open‐top chambers in three plant communities along a 6‐km coastal–inland gradient. We assessed plant community compositional changes following two years of treatments. ResultsGrazing had stronger effects than warming on both plant functional group and species composition. Overall, grazing decreased the abundance of grasses and sedges and increased the abundance of forbs, whereas warming only caused a decrease in forb abundance. However, plant communities and functional groups, both within and across communities, varied widely in their responses to treatments. Grazing decreased grass abundance (−25%) and increased forb abundance (+44%) in the two more coastal communities, and reduced sedge abundance (−22%) only in the most inland community. Warming only decreased forb abundance (−18%) in the most coastal community, which overall was the most responsive to treatments. ConclusionsWe show that short‐term goose grazing predominates over short‐term summer warming in eliciting compositional changes in three different low‐Arctic coastal wetland plant communities. Yet, responses varied among communities and the same functional groups could respond differently across them, highlighting the importance of investigating the effects of biotic and abiotic drivers in different contexts. By showing that tundra wetland plant communities can differ in their immediate sensitivity to goose grazing and, though to a lesser extent, warming, our findings have implications for the functioning of these rapidly changing high‐latitude ecosystems. 

The large carbon (C) stock of wetlands is vulnerable to climate change, especially in high latitudes that are warming at a disproportional rate. Likewise, low-lying Arctic areas will experience increased coastal flooding under climate change and sea-level rise, which may alter goose herbivory and fecal deposition patterns if geese are pushed inland. While temperature, flooding, and feces impact soil C emissions, their interactive effects have been rarely studied. Here, we explore the impact of these interactions on carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions and nitrogen (N) mineralization (ammonification) in soils collected from four plant communities in the Yukon-Kuskokwim (Y-K) Delta, a high latitude coastal wetland in western Alaska. Communities included a Grazing Lawn, which is intensely grazed and susceptible to flooding, a Lowland Wetland and an Upland Wetland that experience moderate grazing and frequent (Lowland) and less frequent (Upland) flooding, and a rarely grazed and flooded Tundra community, located at the highest elevation. Soils were incubated for 16 weeks at 8 degrees Celsius (°C) or 18°C in microcosms and subjected to flooding and feces addition treatments with no-flood and no-feces controls. We quantified C emissions weekly and ammonification over the course of the experiment. While warming increased ammonification and C demand in the Lowland Wetland and always increased CO2 and CH4 emissions, interactions with flooding complicated warming impacts on C emissions in the Grazing Lawn and Tundra. In the Grazing Lawn, flooding increased CH4 emissions at 8°C and 18 °C, but in the Tundra, flooding suppressed CH4 emissions at 18°C. Flooding alone reduced CO2 emissions in the Upland Wetland. Feces addition increased CO2 emissions in all communities, but feces impacts on CH4 emissions and ammonification were minimal. When feces and flooding occurred together in the Lowland Wetland, CH4 emissions decreased compared to when feces was added without concomitant flood. Feces decreased the immobilization of ammonium and N demand in the Tundra only. Our results suggest that flooding could partially offset C loss from warming in less frequently flooded, higher elevation communities, but this offset could be negligible if flooding and warming drastically increase C loss in more flooded lowland areas. 

Vertebrate herbivore excrement is thought to influence nutrient cycling, plant nutrition, and growth; however, its importance is rarely isolated from other aspects of herbivory, such as trampling and leaf removal, leaving questions about the extent to which herbivore effects are due to feces. We hypothesized that as a source of additional nutrients, feces would directly increase soil N concentrations and N2O emission, alleviate plant, and microbial nutrient limitations, resulting in increased plant growth and foliar quality, and increase CH4 emissions. We tested these hypotheses using a field experiment in coastal western Alaska,USA, where we manipulated goose feces such that naturally grazed areas received three treatments:feces removal, ambient amounts of feces, or double ambient amounts of feces. Doubling feces marginally increased NH4 +-N in soil water, whereas both doubled feces and feces removal significantly increased NO3--N; N2O flux was also higher in removal plots. Feces removal marginally reduced root biomass and significantly reduced productivity (that is, GPP) in the second year, measured as greater CO2 emissions. Doubling feces marginally increased foliar chemical quality by increasing %N and decreasing C:N. Treatments did not influence CH4 flux. In short, feces removal created sites poorer in nutrients, with reduced root growth, graminoid nutrient uptake, and productivity. While goose feces alone did not create dramatic changes in nutrient cycling in western Alaska, they do appear to be an important source of nutrients for grazed areas and to contribute to greenhouse gas exchange as their removal increased emissions of CO2 and N2O to the atmosphere.