Search for: All records

Abstract RNA editing modifies cytidines to uridines in plant organelle transcripts so that their sequences differ from the ones predicted from the genomic DNA. This process involves a family of RNA-binding proteins that has significantly expanded, the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR)-containing proteins. In angiosperms, PPR proteins are found in editosomes associated with accessory proteins. The exact function of these accessory proteins has been unclear. Bacterial co-expression of an angiosperm synthetic factor and different accessory proteins, RIP2, RIP9, and ORRM1, demonstrates their essential role in editing of an RNA target. The presence of ORRM1 and RIP2 or ORRM1 and RIP9 in bacteria with the PPR factor results in a target editing extent of 80%, which is similar to what is observed in planta. Accessory proteins increase the affinity of the PPR factor for the target RNA, likely the explanation of their role in improving editing efficiency. RNA-seq analysis of bacterial transcriptome in samples expressing various combinations of accessory proteins along with the synthetic factor identified a total of 34 off-target editing events. Investigation of their upstream sequences that are recognized and bound by the synthetic factor will facilitate the optimization of future designs to improve the specificity of this programmable RNA-editing factor. 

Abstract Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ecotype Col-0 has plastid and mitochondrial genomes encoding over 100 proteins. Public databases (e.g. Araport11) have redundancy and discrepancies in gene identifiers for these organelle-encoded proteins. RNA editing results in changes to specific amino acid residues or creation of start and stop codons for many of these proteins, but the impact of RNA editing at the protein level is largely unexplored due to the complexities of detection. Here, we assembled the nonredundant set of identifiers, their correct protein sequences, and 452 predicted nonsynonymous editing sites of which 56 are edited at lower frequency. We then determined accumulation of edited and/or unedited proteoforms by searching ∼259 million raw tandem MS spectra from ProteomeXchange, which is part of PeptideAtlas (www.peptideatlas.org/builds/arabidopsis/). We identified all mitochondrial proteins and all except 3 plastid-encoded proteins (NdhG/Ndh6, PsbM, and Rps16), but no proteins predicted from the 4 ORFs were identified. We suggest that Rps16 and 3 of the ORFs are pseudogenes. Detection frequencies for each edit site and type of edit (e.g. S to L/F) were determined at the protein level, cross-referenced against the metadata (e.g. tissue), and evaluated for technical detection challenges. We detected 167 predicted edit sites at the proteome level. Minor frequency sites were edited at low frequency at the protein level except for cytochrome C biogenesis 382 at residue 124 (Ccb382-124). Major frequency sites (>50% editing of RNA) only accumulated in edited form (>98% to 100% edited) at the protein level, with the exception of Rpl5-22. We conclude that RNA editing for major editing sites is required for stable protein accumulation.