Search for: All records

Abstract Eclogite thermobarometry is crucial for constraining the depths and temperatures to which oceanic and continental crust subduct. However, obtaining the pressure and temperature (P–T) conditions of eclogites is complex as they commonly display high‐variance mineral assemblages, and the mineral compositions only vary slightly withP–T. In this contribution, we present a comparison between two independent and commonly used thermobarometric approaches for eclogites: conventional thermobarometry and forward phase‐equilibrium modelling. We assess how consistent the thermobarometric calculations are using the garnet–clinopyroxene–phengite barometer and garnet–clinopyroxene thermometer with predictions from forward modelling (i.e. comparing the relative differences between approaches). Our results show that the overall mismatch in methods is typically ±0.2–0.3 GPa and ±29–42°C although differences as large as 80°C and 0.7 GPa are possible for a few narrow ranges ofP–Tconditions in the forward models. Such mismatch is interpreted as the relative differences among methods, and not as absolute uncertainties or accuracies for either method. For most of the investigatedP–Tconditions, the relatively minor differences between methods means that the choice in thermobarometric method itself is less important for geological interpretation than careful sample characterization and petrographic interpretation for derivingP–Tfrom eclogites. Although thermobarometry is known to be sensitive to the assumedX_Fe³⁺of a rock (or mineral), therelativedifferences between methods are not particularly sensitive to the choice of bulk‐rockX_Fe³⁺, except at high temperatures (>650°C, amphibole absent) and for very large differences in assumedX_Fe³⁺(0–0.5). We find that the most important difference between approaches is the activity–composition (a–x) relations, as opposed to the end‐member thermodynamic data or other aspects of experimental calibration. When equivalenta–xrelations are used in the conventional barometer,Pcalculations are nearly identical to phase‐equilibrium models (ΔP < 0.1). To further assess the implications of these results for real rocks, we also evaluate common mathematical optimizations of reaction constants used for obtaining the maximumP–Twith conventional thermobarometric approaches (e.g. using the highestaGrs² × aPrp in garnet and Si content in phengite, and the lowestaDi in clinopyroxene). These approaches should be used with caution, because they may not represent the compositions of equilibrium mineral assemblages at eclogite facies conditions and therefore systematically biasP–Tcalculations. Assuming method accuracy, geological meaningfulP_maxat a typical eclogite facies temperature of ~660°C will be obtained by using the greatestaDi,aCel, andaPrp and lowestaGrs andaMs; garnet and clinopyroxene with the lowest Fe²⁺/Mg ratios may yield geological meaningfulT_maxat a typical eclogite facies pressure of 2.5 GPa.