Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Caenorhabditis elegans gut and cuticle produce a disruptive amount of autofluorescence during imaging. Although C. elegans autofluorescence has been characterized, it has not been characterized at high resolution using both spectral and fluorescence lifetime-based approaches. We performed high resolution spectral scans of whole, living animals to characterize autofluorescence of adult C. elegans. By scanning animals at 405 nm, 473 nm, 561 nm, and 647 nm excitations, we produced spectral profiles that confirm the brightest autofluorescence has a clear spectral overlap with the emission of green fluorescent protein (GFP). We then used fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) to further characterize autofluorescence in the cuticle and the gut. Using FLIM, we were able to isolate and quantify dim GFP signal within the sensory cilia of a single pair of neurons that is often obscured by cuticle autofluorescence. In the gut, we found distinct spectral populations of autofluorescence that could be excited by 405 nm and 473 nm lasers. Further, we found lifetime differences between subregions of this autofluorescence when stimulated at 473 nm. Our results suggest that FLIM can be used to differentiate biochemically unique populations of gut autofluorescence without labeling. Further studies involving C. elegans may benefit from combining high resolution spectral and lifetime imaging to isolate fluorescent protein signal that is mixed with background autofluorescence and to perform useful characterization of subcellular structures in a label-free manner. 

Abstract Visualizing fluorescence‐tagged molecules is a powerful strategy that can reveal the complex dynamics of the cell. One robust and broadly applicable method is immunofluorescence microscopy, in which a fluorescence‐labeled antibody binds the molecule of interest and then the location of the antibody is determined by fluorescence microscopy. The effective application of this technique includes several considerations, such as the nature of the antigen, specificity of the antibody, permeabilization and fixation of the specimen, and fluorescence imaging of the cell. Although each protocol will require fine‐tuning depending on the cell type, antibody, and antigen, there are steps common to nearly all applications. This article provides protocols for staining the cytoskeleton and organelles in two very different kinds of cells: flat, adherent fibroblasts and thick, free‐swimmingTetrahymenacells. Additional protocols enable visualization with widefield, laser scanning confocal, and eSRRF super‐resolution fluorescence microscopy. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Immunofluorescence staining of adherent cells such as fibroblasts Basic Protocol 2: Immunofluorescence of suspension cells such asTetrahymena Basic Protocol 3: Visualizing samples with a widefield fluorescence microscope Alternate Protocol 1: Staining suspension cells adhered to poly‐l‐lysine‐coated coverslips Alternate Protocol 2: Visualizing samples with a laser scanning confocal microscope Alternate Protocol 3: Generating super‐resolution images with SRRF microscopy