skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 10:00 PM to 12:00 PM ET on Tuesday, March 25 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 2217144

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Free, publicly-accessible full text available November 1, 2025
  2. Free, publicly-accessible full text available October 21, 2025
  3. Free, publicly-accessible full text available October 13, 2025
  4. Rate enforcement is routinely employed in modern networks (e.g. ISPs rate-limiting users traffic to the subscribed rates). In addition to correctly enforcing the desired rates, rate-limiting mechanisms must be able to support rich rate-sharing policies within each traffic aggregate (e.g. per-flow fairness, weighted fairness, and prioritization). And all of this must be done at scale to efficiently support the vast magnitude of users. There are two primary rate-limiting mechanisms -- traffic shaping (that buffers packets in queues to enforce the desired rates and policies) and traffic policing (that filters packets as per the desired rates without buffering them). Policers are light-weight and scalable, but do not support rich policy enforcement and often provide poor rate enforcement (being notoriously hard to configure). Shapers, on the other hand, achieve desired rates and policies, but at the cost of high system resource (memory and CPU) utilization which impacts scalability. In this paper, we explore whether we can get the best of both worlds -- the scalability of a policer with the rate and policy enforcement properties of a shaper. We answer this question in the affirmative with our system BC-PQP. BC-PQP augments a policer with (i) multiple phantom queues that simulate buffer occupancy using counters, and enable rich policy enforcement, and (ii) a novel burst control mechanism that enables auto-configuration of the queues for correct rate enforcement. We implement BC-PQP as a middlebox over DPDK. Our evaluation shows how it achieves the rate and policy enforcement properties close to that of a shaper with 7x higher efficiency. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available August 4, 2025
  5. Free, publicly-accessible full text available June 9, 2025
  6. Free, publicly-accessible full text available June 1, 2025
  7. Free, publicly-accessible full text available May 25, 2025
  8. Free, publicly-accessible full text available May 15, 2025
  9. Free, publicly-accessible full text available May 10, 2025
  10. Free, publicly-accessible full text available April 27, 2025