skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 2217635

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. ABSTRACT Organisms can react to environmental variation by altering their phenotype, and such phenotypic plasticity is often adaptive. This plasticity contributes to the diversity of phenotypes across the tree of life. Generally, the production of these phenotypes must be preceded by assessment, where the individual acquires information about its environment and phenotype relative to that environment, and then determines if and how to respond with an alternative phenotype. The role of assessment in adaptive plasticity is, therefore, crucial. In this Review, we (1) highlight the need for explicitly considering the role of assessment in plasticity; (2) present two different models for how assessment and the facultative production of phenotypes are related; and (3) describe an overarching framework for how assessment evolves. In doing so, we articulate avenues of future work and suggest that explicitly considering the role of assessment in the evolution of plasticity is key to explaining how and when plasticity occurs. Moreover, we emphasize the need to understand the role of assessment in adaptive versus maladaptive plasticity, which is an issue that will become increasingly important in a rapidly changing world. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Parental effects are often considered an evolved response, in which parents transmit information about the environment to enhance offspring fitness. However, these effects need not be adaptive. Here, we provide a striking example by presenting evidence that overfeeding of adult Mexican spadefoot toads, Spea multiplicata, is associated with decreased offspring survival. After a temporary change to their standard feeding regimen, S. multiplicata in our captive colony developed a much higher body condition (i.e. body mass for a given body length) than those in the wild. We analysed data from three subsequent experiments and found that although the body condition of a father was positively correlated with tadpole survival, mothers with a higher condition had lower tadpole survival. Our study highlights how obesity can negatively impact future generations via maladaptive maternal effects. Such effects could be especially likely for animals living in variable environments (such as spadefoots) that have evolved ‘thrifty phenotypes’ that make them prone to obesity. Our study also illustrates how husbandry conditions typically regarded as beneficial might be harmful. Given that captive breeding programmes are increasingly used to combat worldwide amphibian declines, these programmes must consider the ecology and evolutionary history of the focal species to minimize any maladaptive parental effects. 
    more » « less
  3. Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 1, 2025