skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 2226406

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Free, publicly-accessible full text available July 30, 2026
  2. Free, publicly-accessible full text available May 19, 2026
  3. Free, publicly-accessible full text available April 29, 2026
  4. Practical reproducibility is the ability to reproduce results is a manner that is cost-effective enough to become a vehicle of mainstream scientific exploration. Since computational research artifacts usually require some form of computing to interpret, open and programmable infrastructure, such as a range of NSF-supported testbeds spanning infrastructure from datacen- ter through networks to wireless systems, is a necessary – but not sufficient – requirement for reproducibility. The question arises what other services and tools should build on the availability of such programmable infrastructure to foster the development and sharing of findable, accessible, integrated, and reusable (FAIR) experiments that underpin practical reproducibility. In this paper, we propose three such services addressing the problems of packaging for reuse, findability, and accessibility, respectively. We describe how we developed these services in Chameleon, an NSF-funded testbed for computer science research which has supported the research of a community of 8,000+ users, and discuss their strengths and limitations. 
    more » « less