skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 2247352

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Private set intersection (PSI) enables two parties to jointly compute the intersection of their private sets without revealing any extra information to each other. In this work, we focus on the unbalanced setting where one party (a powerful server) holds a significantly larger set than the other party (a resource-limited client). We present a new protocol for this setting that achieves a better balance between low client-side storage and efficient online processing. We first formalize a general framework to transform Private Information Retrieval (PIR) into PSI with techniques used in prior works. Building upon recent advancements in Private Information Retrieval (PIR), specifically the SimplePIR construction (Henzinger et al., USENIX Security'23), combined with our tailored techniques, our construction shows a great improvement in online efficiency. Concretely, when the client holds a single element, our protocol achieves more than 100x faster computation and over 4x lower communication compared to the state-of-the-art unbalanced PSI based on leveled fully homomorphic encryption (Chen et al., CCS'21). The client-side storage is only in the order of tens of megabytes, even for a gigabyte-sized set on the server. Moreover, since the framework is generic, any future improvement in PIR can further improve our construction. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available April 8, 2026
  2. Understanding the relationship between genotypes and phenotypes is crucial for advancing personalized medicine. Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping plays a significant role by correlating genetic variants to gene expression levels. Despite the progress made by large-scale projects, eQTL mapping still faces challenges in statistical power and privacy concerns. Multi-site studies can increase sample sizes but are hindered by privacy issues. We present privateQTL, a novel framework leveraging secure multi-party computation for secure and federated eQTL mapping. When tested in a real-world scenario with data from different studies, privateQTL outperformed meta-analysis by accurately correcting for covariates and batch effect and retaining higher accuracy and precision for both eGene-eVariant mapping and effect size estimation. In addition, privateQTL is modular and scalable, making it adaptable for other molecular phenotypes and large-scale studies. Our results indicate that privateQTL is a practical solution for privacy-preserving collaborative eQTL mapping. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available February 12, 2026
  3. Private set intersection (PSI) allows two mutually distrusting parties each holding a private set of elements, to learn the intersection of their sets without revealing anything beyond the intersection. Recent work (Badrinarayanan et al., PoPETS’22) initiates the study of updatable PSI (UPSI), which allows the two parties to compute PSI on a regular basis with sets that constantly get updated, where both the computation and communication complexity only grow with the size of the small updates and not the large entire sets. However, there are several limitations of their presented protocols. First, they can only be used to compute the plain PSI functionality and do not support extended functionalities such as PSI-Cardinality and PSI-Sum. Second, they only allow parties to add new elements to their existing set and do not support arbitrary deletion of elements. Finally, their addition-only protocols either require both parties to learn the output or only achieve low complexity in an amortized sense and incur linear worst-case complexity. In this work, we address all the above limitations. In particular, we study UPSI with semi-honest security in both the addition-only and addition-deletion settings. We present new protocols for both settings that support plain PSI as well as extended functionalities including PSI-Cardinality and PSI-Sum, achieving one-sided output (which implies two-sided output). In the addition-only setting, we also present a protocol for a more general functionality Circuit-PSI that outputs secret shares of the intersection. All of our protocols have worst-case computation and communication complexity that only grow with the set updates instead of the entire sets (except for a polylogarithmic factor). We implement our new UPSI protocols and compare with the state-of-the-art protocols for PSI and extended functionalities. Our protocols compare favorably when the total set sizes are sufficiently large, the new updates are sufficiently small, or in networks with low bandwidth. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 12, 2025
  4. Privacy-preserving machine learning (PPML) enables multiple distrusting parties to jointly train ML models on their private data without revealing any information beyond the final trained models. In this work, we study the client-aided two-server setting where two non-colluding servers jointly train an ML model on the data held by a large number of clients. By involving the clients in the training process, we develop efficient protocols for training algorithms including linear regression, logistic regression, and neural networks. In particular, we introduce novel approaches to securely computing inner product, sign check, activation functions (e.g., ReLU, logistic function), and division on secret shared values, leveraging lightweight computation on the client side. We present constructions that are secure against semi-honest clients and further enhance them to achieve security against malicious clients. We believe these new client-aided techniques may be of independent interest. We implement our protocols and compare them with the two-server PPML protocols presented in SecureML (Mohassel and Zhang, S&P’17) across various settings and ABY2.0 (Patra et al., Usenix Security’21) theoretically. We demonstrate that with the assistance of untrusted clients in the training process, we can significantly improve both the communication and computational efficiency by orders of magnitude. Our protocols compare favorably in all the training algorithms on both LAN and WAN networks. 
    more » « less
  5. Boldyreva, Alexandra; Kolesnikov, Vladimir (Ed.)
    Updatable Encryption (UE) and Proxy Re-encryption (PRE) allow re-encrypting a ciphertext from one key to another in the symmetric-key and public-key settings, respectively, without decryption. A longstanding open question has been the following: do unidirectional UE and PRE schemes (where ciphertext re-encryption is permitted in only one direction) necessarily require stronger/more structured assumptions as compared to their bidirectional counterparts? Known constructions of UE and PRE seem to exemplify this “gap” – while bidirectional schemes can be realized as relatively simple extensions of public-key encryption from standard assumptions such as DDH or LWE, unidirectional schemes typically rely on stronger assumptions such as FHE or indistinguishability obfuscation (iO), or highly structured cryptographic tools such as bilinear maps or lattice trapdoors. In this paper, we bridge this gap by showing the first feasibility results for realizing unidirectional UE and PRE from a new generic primitive that we call Key and Plaintext Homomorphic Encryption (KPHE) – a public-key encryption scheme that supports additive homomorphisms on its plaintext and key spaces simultaneously. We show that KPHE can be instantiated from DDH. This yields the first constructions of unidirectional UE and PRE from DDH. Our constructions achieve the strongest notions of post-compromise security in the standard model. Our UE schemes also achieve “backwards-leak directionality” of key updates (a notion we discuss is equivalent, from a security perspective, to that of unidirectionality with no-key updates). Our results establish (somewhat surprisingly) that unidirectional UE and PRE schemes satisfying such strong security notions do not, in fact, require stronger/more structured cryptographic assumptions as compared to bidirectional schemes. 
    more » « less
  6. Abstract Private set intersection (PSI) allows two mutually distrusting parties each with a set as input, to learn the intersection of both their sets without revealing anything more about their respective input sets. Traditionally, PSI studies the static setting where the computation is performed only once on both parties’ input sets. We initiate the study of updatable private set intersection (UPSI), which allows parties to compute the intersection of their private sets on a regular basis with sets that also constantly get updated. We consider two specific settings. In the first setting called UPSI with addition , parties can add new elements to their old sets. We construct two protocols in this setting, one allowing both parties to learn the output and the other only allowing one party to learn the output. In the second setting called UPSI with weak deletion , parties can additionally delete their old elements every t days. We present a protocol for this setting allowing both parties to learn the output. All our protocols are secure against semi-honest adversaries and have the guarantee that both the computational and communication complexity only grow with the set updates instead of the entire sets. Finally, we implement our UPSI with addition protocols and compare with the state-of-the-art PSI protocols. Our protocols compare favorably when the total set size is sufficiently large, the new updates are sufficiently small, or in networks with low bandwidth. 
    more » « less