Search for: All records

Abstract Planktonic foraminifera are key contributors to the oceanic carbon cycle. In pelagic environments, carbonate production by planktonic biomineralizers regulates ocean-atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange and exports surface carbon to the deep ocean. Here we compare shell traits of three planktonic foraminifera species from the central Atlantic with a suite of environmental parameters to discern the factors underlying their variations. Our analysis revealed that calcification in foraminifera is associated with seawater density and depends on species habitat depth, whereas foraminifera bulk shell densities may serve as a seawater density proxy, regardless of species. We observe that their shell weights increased with habitat depth, enabling the living cells to adjust their overall density to match that of the surrounding liquid. This suggests that calcification in nonmotile organisms has a buoyancy regulatory function and will respond to the anthropogenically driven reductions in ocean density (oceanic rarefication), with potential consequences for the carbon cycle. 

ABSTRACT AimBiological diversity is shaped by processes occurring at different spatial and temporal scales. However, the direct influence of the spatial and temporal scale on patterns of occupancy is still understudied. Today, occupancy is often negatively correlated with species richness, but it is unknown whether this relationship is scale dependent and consistent through time. Here, we use datasets of contemporary and paleontological communities to explore the occupancy‐richness relationship across space and time, examining how scale influences this relationship. LocationVarying spatial extents with global coverage. TimeVaries from 7 mya to 2021 CE. Taxaforaminifera, mammals, birds, fish, and plants. MethodsWe gathered datasets spanning different spatial, temporal, and taxonomic extents. We binned each dataset into distinct time periods and spatially subsampled them into regional pools of varying sizes. We calculated regional occupancy and richness for each pool, measuring the strength of the relationship between the two. Using linear mixed models, we related the occupancy‐richness relationship to the size of the regional pools, overall species richness, and climatic changes through time. ResultsWe observed nearly ubiquitous negative occupancy‐richness relationships across taxa, spatial scale, and time. The size of the regional pools and time bins had no consistent effects on the strength of the relationship, but the strength of the negative relationship varied substantially among taxa, with foraminifera and North American pollen showing weaker relationships than mammals and birds. Changes in this relationship through time were not driven by climatic perturbations but by the species richness observed across all regional pools. ConclusionsPatterns of regional richness and occupancy are consistently negatively related and independent of spatial and temporal scale and of direct climatic changes. However, differences in the ecology of species (e.g., dispersal ability) and changes in biodiversity and community composition through time may cause fluctuations in the strength of the occupancy‐richness relationship. 

Island mammals have influenced ecological and evolutionary theory since Darwin, and many of them provide textbook examples of the dramatic morphological evolution that often occurs in island communities. However, patterns of evolution in the climatic niches of island mammals have yet to be fully explored. Several hypotheses explaining niche divergence in island species have been introduced, linking niche evolution to increased competition among closely related or sympatric species, and as a by‐product of morphological evolution or geographical patterns. Here, we evaluate these hypotheses using closely related species pairs (sister taxa). We characterized the climatic niches of island endemic species and their closest relatives and calculated two metrics of niche divergence between the species (niche overlap and centroid distance). We compared these metrics between island endemics that have island‐dwelling sister taxa and those that have mainland‐dwelling sister taxa. We then related the degree of niche divergence to phylogenetic relatedness between the sister taxa, sympatry, morphological trait differences and island characteristics (isolation, size, age). Overall, despite significant niche divergence across species pairs, we found little evidence that competition or biotic interactions drive large‐scale climatic niche evolution in island mammals. Niche divergence in island‐endemic mammals is not driven by sympatry with their closest relatives, nor is it linked to phylogenetic relatedness. Furthermore, the phenotypic evolution of island‐endemic species does not lead to corresponding evolution in climatic niches. Instead, abiotic, geographical patterns appear to drive niche divergence in these species. Sister taxa that were more geographically isolated from each other had significantly lower niche overlaps. Island‐endemic mammals that live in montane regions likewise diverged from their closest relatives. These results suggest that competition between related species on islands may lead to niche partitioning only on local scales and that niche evolution in island‐endemic mammals may occur primarily in response to geographical patterns.