Search for: All records

Abstract MotivationThousands of genomes are publicly available, however, most genes in those genomes have poorly defined functions. This is partly due to a gap between previously published, experimentally characterized protein activities and activities deposited in databases. This activity deposition is bottlenecked by the time-consuming biocuration process. The emergence of large language models presents an opportunity to speed up the text-mining of protein activities for biocuration. ResultsWe developed FuncFetch—a workflow that integrates NCBI E-Utilities, OpenAI’s GPT-4, and Zotero—to screen thousands of manuscripts and extract enzyme activities. Extensive validation revealed high precision and recall of GPT-4 in determining whether the abstract of a given paper indicates the presence of a characterized enzyme activity in that paper. Provided the manuscript, FuncFetch extracted data such as species information, enzyme names, sequence identifiers, substrates, and products, which were subjected to extensive quality analyses. Comparison of this workflow against a manually curated dataset of BAHD acyltransferase activities demonstrated a precision/recall of 0.86/0.64 in extracting substrates. We further deployed FuncFetch on nine large plant enzyme families. Screening 26 543 papers, FuncFetch retrieved 32 605 entries from 5459 selected papers. We also identified multiple extraction errors including incorrect associations, nontarget enzymes, and hallucinations, which highlight the need for further manual curation. The BAHD activities were verified, resulting in a comprehensive functional fingerprint of this family and revealing that ∼70% of the experimentally characterized enzymes are uncurated in the public domain. FuncFetch represents an advance in biocuration and lays the groundwork for predicting the functions of uncharacterized enzymes. Availability and implementationCode and minimally curated activities are available at: https://github.com/moghelab/funcfetch and https://tools.moghelab.org/funczymedb. 

Abstract Plant metabolomes are structurally diverse. One of the most popular techniques for sampling this diversity is liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC‐MS), which typically detects thousands of peaks from single organ extracts, many representing true metabolites. These peaks are usually annotated using in‐house retention time or spectral libraries, in silico fragmentation libraries, and increasingly through computational techniques such as machine learning. Despite these advances, over 85% of LC‐MS peaks remain unidentified, posing a major challenge for data analysis and biological interpretation. This bottleneck limits our ability to fully understand the diversity, functions, and evolution of plant metabolites. In this review, we first summarize current approaches for metabolite identification, highlighting their challenges and limitations. We further focus on alternative strategies that bypass the need for metabolite identification, allowing researchers to interpret global metabolic patterns and pinpoint key metabolite signals. These methods include molecular networking, distance‐based approaches, information theory–based metrics, and discriminant analysis. Additionally, we explore their practical applications in plant science and highlight a set of useful tools to support researchers in analyzing complex plant metabolomics data. By adopting these approaches, researchers can enhance their ability to uncover new insights into plant metabolism.