Search for: All records

According to the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, union density amongst engineering workers within the US hovers around 7%. Despite hundreds of thousands of US engineers participating in the labor movement, engineering education on labor unions has been virtually non-existent within US higher education engineering programs. US higher education engineering programs are critical junctures in the making of engineers that have long histories of ensnarement by corporate industries with vested interests in undermining organized labor. This stark and significant absence of labor education coupled with decades-long denunciations that many engineering professional societies have made to discourage participation of engineers in building labor unions and the labor movement interrupt engineers’ capacity to collectively leverage our power for safer, healthier, and more just workplaces and worlds. An imperative task in the (re)development of the US engineering workforce is to build and strengthen union density amongst engineers by expanding unionization pathways. This paper offers a preliminary report back on a broader engineering workforce development project to nurture relationships between an unorganized (i.e. non-union) engineering research center and organized labor. Herein, we uplift stories from union members describing their pathways from higher education engineering programs to labor unions. Group interview conversations illuminating these stories offer broader contextualization for the sparseness and rarity of the paths from engineering programs to labor unions. Dialogue from group interviews further pointed toward opportunities to expand unionization pathways for engineering workers. 

US engineering professional societies have been influential institutions that propagate a constricted understanding of the roles and responsibilities of an engineer within society by upholding an alignment of industry over engineering reflective of a hegemonic adherence to business professionalism. The ideology of business professionalism advances beliefs that engineers are, and should be, unshakably beholden to capitalist corporate owners and the industries they extract profit through. In this paper, we examine the historically anti-union attitudes and actions of the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE), and their adherence to the ideology of business professionalism, through analysis of ethics case studies published by their Board of Ethical Review (BER). As an advocate of professional engineering licensure and as leaders in engineering ethics standards, NSPE’s consistent anti-union stance lays bare a clear bias to the needs of industry and the capitalist mode of production at the expense of the collective bargaining power of engineers as workers. NSPE is an influential organization in the codification of engineering rules of practice, so it is valuable to deconstruct their application of their code of ethics to justify anti-union arguments.