Search for: All records

Abstract BackgroundEctothermic arthropods, like ticks, are sensitive indicators of environmental changes, and their seasonality plays a critical role in the dynamics of tick-borne disease in a warming world. Juvenile tick phenology, which influences pathogen transmission, may vary across climates, with longer tick seasons in cooler climates potentially amplifying transmission. However, assessing juvenile tick phenology is challenging in arid climates because ticks spend less time seeking for blood meals (i.e. questing) due to desiccation pressures. As a result, traditional collection methods like dragging or flagging are less effective. To improve our understanding of juvenile tick seasonality across a latitudinal gradient, we examinedIxodes pacificusphenology on lizards, the primary juvenile tick host in California, and explored how climate factors influence phenological patterns. MethodsBetween 2013 and 2022, ticks were removed from 1527 lizards at 45 locations during peak tick season (March–June). Tick counts were categorized by life stage (larvae and nymphs) and linked with remotely sensed climate data, including monthly maximum temperature, specific humidity and Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI). Juvenile phenology metrics, including tick abundances on lizards, Julian date of peak mean abundance and temporal overlap between larval and nymphal populations, were analyzed along a latitudinal gradient. Generalized additive models (GAMs) were applied to assess climate-associated variation in juvenile abundance on lizards. ResultsMean tick abundance per lizard ranged from 0.17 to 47.21 across locations, with the highest abundance in the San Francisco Bay Area and lowest in Los Angeles, where more lizards had zero ticks attached. In the San Francisco Bay Area, peak nymphal abundance occurred 25 days earlier than peak larval abundance. Temporal overlap between larval and nymphal stages at a given location varied regionally, with northern areas showing higher overlap, possibly due to the bimodal seasonality of nymphs. We found that locations with higher temperatures and increased drought stress were linked to lower tick abundances, although the magnitude of these effects depended on regional location. ConclusionsOur study, which compiled 10 years of data, reveals significant regional variation in juvenileI. pacificusphenology across California, including differences in abundance, peak timing, and temporal overlap. These findings highlight the influence of local climate on tick seasonality, with implications for tick-borne disease dynamics in a changing climate. Graphical Abstract 

Abstract Mosquito‐borne diseases contribute substantially to the global burden of disease, and are strongly influenced by environmental conditions. Ongoing and rapid environmental change necessitates improved understanding of the response of mosquito‐borne diseases to environmental factors like temperature, and novel approaches to mapping and monitoring risk. Recent development of trait‐based mechanistic models has improved understanding of the temperature dependence of transmission, but model predictions remain challenging to validate in the field. Using West Nile virus (WNV) as a case study, we illustrate the use of a novel remote sensing‐based approach to mapping temperature‐dependent mosquito and viral traits at high spatial resolution and across the diurnal cycle. We validate the approach using mosquito and WNV surveillance data controlling for other key factors in the ecology of WNV, finding strong agreement between temperature‐dependent traits and field‐based metrics of risk. Moreover, we find that WNV infection rate in mosquitos exhibits a unimodal relationship with temperature, peaking at ~24.6–25.2°C, in the middle of the 95% credible interval of optimal temperature for transmission of WNV predicted by trait‐based mechanistic models. This study represents one of the highest resolution validations of trait‐based model predictions, and illustrates the utility of a novel remote sensing approach to predicting mosquito‐borne disease risk.